Talk:Livable Netherlands

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

The goal of "a just asylum-seeker policy" mentioned in the article not only could mean about anything, it also sounds like a strange euphemism for a xenophobic agenda given that Pim Fortuyn was a member of this party. Somehow who knows anything about "Livable Netherlands" (which clearly rules me out) should elaborate on this point at least. After reading the article I have no idea what they stood for except that they wished for more public participation. I find it hard to believe that this and the above-mentioned "just asylum-seeker policy" were their only concerns. --Mudd1 (talk) 16:43, 29 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Livable Netherlands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply