Talk:Little Wonder (horse)
 | A fact from Little Wonder (horse) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 January 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
A "Little Known" Fact edit
I have taken out some material which was definitely OR: I think it's OK now. I have just stated the facts about Little Wonder's "brother". If you read between the lines of what is currently ref 17 [1] I think it's pretty clear what's being hinted at.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 02:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Bias edit
The comments regarding Little Wonder's loss by a length to the filly Darkness seems like speculation. Practically, a 50/1 shot won a stakes, but in his next outing is pegged as 4/6 and comes second, only a novice handicapper would call the race a sham. To underline the reaction by racegoers and not putting it into perspective of what it means to run a horse race, is misleading. Also, organizational and grammatical problems throughout. Primary sources much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.99.109.89 (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- "organizational and grammatical problems throughout"- can you give any examples? I am always anxious to improve the quality of articles. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 21:35, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Little Wonder (horse). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120918153359/http://www.vaugrat.demon.co.uk/Angvil/history/derby.htm to http://www.vaugrat.demon.co.uk/Angvil/history/derby.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 4 January 2018 (UTC)