 | Daniel K. Kim was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 09 July 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Lit Motors. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lit Motors article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Explanation of gyroscopic stabilisers edit
I suggest Wikipedia 'gyro monorail' for an explanation of gyroscopic stabilisers, and also the talk page. DavidJErskine (talk) 12:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Newbie's question about objectivity edit
Hi! I was poking around for motor stuff and thought this article's tone was a little off. For one, it uses the past tense, but I thought this company was still at least trying? And there are a few "many critics say" type statements that are not supported with citations. I've seen lots of live articles flagged for this issue; should this likewise be flagged? It seems like maybe a complicated issue for a newbie to tackle, but I'm willing to give it a shot! Otherwise, can someone more experienced flag it? Thanks so much! Spiegelmama (talk) 22:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Just Look edit
A quick Google search shows Lit Motors location at 1086 Folsom St, San Francisco, CA 94103 was vacant and up for lease. It appears to have since been leased. Another Google search shows that D. Kim also used to reside at that location (the shop has apartments above) but no longer does. So, you do the math. 50.34.112.51 (talk) 05:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- @50.34.112.51 litmotors.com has an updated copyright notice, and appears to be back. I'd speculate that this is connected to their resolved litigation.
- Perhaps this article should use the present tense instead of the past tense? At the same time, I don't know that they have any reputable sources reporting on their revival. Libraryresearch6 (talk) 02:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)