This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion
Do we even need this page? I don't think it's customary for us to list the complete works even of major authors (except when they have a very small output). The major works (I have no idea which they are) can be merged back onto the author's page. -R. fiend 15:59, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Agree. It seems that for most composers, poets, etc., their works are given on the same page as their biography. I don't see any reason not to do that in this case. Also, even if the complete list of works were added to the composer's main page, it wouldn't overwhelm the page, which is quite extensive. AlbertBickford (talk) 04:33, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Oppose the list is too big for a merge.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 06:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply