Talk:List of works based on Peter Pan

Fair use rationale for Image:PeterPan1.jpg

Image:PeterPan1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PeterPanPoster2.jpg

Image:PeterPanPoster2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use images

Contrary to what User:Papa November asserts in his edit summaries, fair-use images are permitted in "list" articles. There are even guidelines for how it should/n't be done. It says that "non-free images should be used judiciously to present the key visual aspects of the topic" and "images that are used only to visually identify elements in the article should be used as sparingly as possible." I believe the usage in this article was both judicious and sparing. It says that "It is inadvisable to provide a non-free image for each entry in such an article or section," and the article did not. The guidelines say to restrict usage "as agreed to by editor consensus", and there is no basis in these guidelines for the unilateral removal of all fair use images from the article. - JasonAQuest (talk) 16:23, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Oops - it looks like I've been a bit overzealous. However, in the context of this article, there were only actually two images with non-free fair use rationales for them to appear here. I've added them both back in to the article, but their fair use rationales really need a lot of work still. It's still unclear from the fair-use rationales why you specifically need to show Image:PeterPan1.jpg and Image:PeterPanPoster2.jpg. Are those productions especially notable? As said in the guidelines, it's inadvisable to provide an illustration for every list item. You'll need to decide which items (if any) need to be illustrated, and how best to do it. Papa November (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Self published?

Isn't R Scott Leatherwood's prequel self-published as well? Global Quest Publishing is not a mainstream publisher and its president is the author himself. Looks suspiciously like vanity press to me... Stelmaris (talk) 14:33, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

I hadn't noticed that, but you're apparently right. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 16:01, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Hook and Peter by Doram Jacoby

(Books – fiction:)

Hook and Peter by Doram Jacoby (2013).

—Haim Berman (talk) 15:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of works based on Peter Pan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://neverpedia.info/pan/After_the_Rain
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511213832/http://www.ridleypearson.com/appearances.html to http://www.ridleypearson.com/appearances.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://neverpedia.info/pan/The_Lost
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://neverpedia.info/pan/%E3%83%AD%E3%82%B9%E3%83%88%E3%83%9C%E3%83%BC%E3%82%A4%E3%82%BA
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080703212402/http://www.stilesanddrewe.co.uk/peter_pan/ to http://www.stilesanddrewe.co.uk/peter_pan/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708143837/http://www.chicagotheater.com/revPePan.html to http://www.chicagotheater.com/revPePan.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721002954/http://www.lamarseillaise.fr/th-tre-humour/jeu-d-enfant.html to http://www.lamarseillaise.fr/th-tre-humour/jeu-d-enfant.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://neverpedia.info/pan/%D0%9F%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80_%D0%9F%D1%8D%D0%BD

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 3 January 2018 (UTC)