Talk:List of rural municipalities in Saskatchewan

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Tamfang in topic gaps?

Signature edit

SriMesh | talk 04:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Northern Administration District, Saskatchewan edit

Should we add the Northern Administration District to the list of rural municipalities? It doesn't have a number, but it seems like it's the same as any other rural municipality, and I believe "Northern Administration District" is its official name. In any case, I'm going to change any references to Northern Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan in the rural municipality articles to Northern Administration District, Saskatchewan. Thank you. Ultraflame 23:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-existent? edit

I looked at some official maps of RM boundaries and some of those listed here (25, 55, I didn't check further) don't seem to exist. Was I looking at dated maps? or is this page incorrect? Lavateraguy (talk) 20:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

~In my opinion...These could be listed here and the articles made as re directs to the current RM which assumed them when the RM's were re-assigned areas and designations at various times. Such happened for Corman Park No. 344 which assumed Cory 344, Warman 374 , and Park 375... or Rural Municipality Number 345 of Richland which was absorbed into into Loganton and into Vanscoy No. 345.SriMesh | talk 03:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
It looks like the numbers refer to locations, so the gaps are possibly because were no rural municipalities in some areas, or the areas were part of others, and a few of them, such as the gap between 19 and 31, probably couldn't have existed as they would have been outside the boundaries of Saskatchewan. The numbers such as 25 and 55 appear to have been typos in some of the sources, so I have changed them to 225 and 255. There is a list of "disorganized" rural municipalities at http://www.municipal.gov.sk.ca/Municipal-History/RMs-Disorganized, so maybe these could be added, although I can't find any information about them other than the dates when they are disorganised). snigbrook (talk) 22:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of rural municipalities in Saskatchewan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:25, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of rural municipalities in Saskatchewan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

gaps? edit

If there are 296 RMs and 21 former RMs, why does the numbering go to 622? —Tamfang (talk) 06:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply