Talk:List of hanfu

Song Dynasty section

Why remove the Song Dynasty section?? --Lennlin (talk) 02:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

There are a lot of errors in the information regarding Song Dynasty clothings. Both Ru and Ao were worn by women only, and is always worn with a skirt (In fact, Ao was derived from Ru). The diferences between Pao and Shan (both being long robes) is still not very clearly defined, and Zhiduo itself is a kind of Pao. And I have no idea what kind of Shan you are refering to in the Song Dynasty section. Women of Song Dynasty loved to wear Beizi, which was slightly different from Ming Dynasty Beizi. I plan to add a section on Ming Dynasty Royal Hanfu as well, most which descended directly from Song Dynasty (like the blue gown of the Song Dynasty empress). Also, there is very little differences between Song and Ming Dynasty Hanfu. I can explain about those Song Dynasty Hanfu in the Ming Dynasty Hanfu stubs as well (it can just be a simple "This style of Hanfu descended from Song Dynasty"). This is to avoid repetition. Supersentai (talk) 04:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

• I'll add individual articles of the different styles of Hanfu. Supersentai (talk) 15:12, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Okay then how aboout changing the headline to Ming-Song Dynasty or Ming and Song Dynasty to make it clear? Btw i just want to include Song Facial Marks too =]--Lennlin (talk) 15:16, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

• I'll try to include that as well, but I need to do some research on it, because the facial marks descended from Tang Dynasty, so I'm thinking of combining them into one article. It's quite difficult to divide Hanfu by Dynasty. This list is still sort of 'work in progress'. Supersentai (talk) 16:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

i think there are some small significant difference between empress of ming and song clothing... --64.131.234.108 (talk) 21:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Do you have any good picture of banbi? that pic looks horrible. > [1] Hey sentai you should also watch this video [2], it's a 3 part video so u should watch all 3 parts.--Lennlin (talk) 21:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

• Currently, that's the best picture I can find of Ming Dynasty Banbi. Other images of modern-made Banbi are either watermarked or have the models striking weird poses. Also, I knew about this Hanfu shop when it was first established [3]. I don't really like their style, to be honest. Supersentai (talk) 22:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

hey sentai what you working on right now? maybe i can help! --Lennlin (talk) 00:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

• Hanfu of the Ming royalty. Basically, most of them are yuanlingshan, but there are still some special ones, like mianfu (冕服), diyi (翟衣), and the phoenix crown etc. Most of these actually descended from earlier dynasties. Supersentai (talk) 01:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

• hey check out the image from Ming Dynasty! click here [[4]] and here [[5]]

• PS. you can always search image already uploaded to wiki on wiki common link -> [[6]] if you don't know yet

--Lennlin (talk) 03:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Sentai check this website out [7]! if you know chinese, they listed Ming and Tang Clothing in drawing. The pictures they posted there are free i think. It's a cultural site. --64.131.234.81 (talk) 15:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

• I have an idea. For styles of hanfu that kept developing throughout history, we can put them in one article. For example, since ruqun from earlier history developed into aoqun, we can include some information of ruqun history under the aoqun article. Thus, I suggest that instead of dividing hanfu by dynasty, we divide them by style (since basically all style of hanfu developed one way or another into Ming Dynasty, it would be easier this way). Supersentai (talk) 03:41, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

YEAH! i like your idea!! i really want to see tang clothing in here. please can anyone add it not like the one got removed recently? please someone!--199.219.144.51 (talk) 16:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

• I've made the change for the ruqun article. Any views? Supersentai (talk) 12:38, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

It's a good idea but abit of confusion to people who are new to hanfu. I suggest maybe add names of each style of ruqun and create category for each style. --Lennlin (talk) 16:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

For Example:

History of Ruqun

descrpition

Aoqun

""Aoqun"" Description

• Very little fact is known about ruqun of earlier dynasties, so there is only so much that can be written on them. I have removed the computer-drawn images from ruqun article, as they are not very accurate. I will add more ancient paintings instead. Supersentai (talk) 23:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

it's still confusing, considering the title named Ruqun and the main picture for it is Aoqun yet there are tang ruqun, aoqun , and standard ruqun on the page. It's a problem for readers to understand what is what and which one influence which. I don't know, maybe someone else can make some opinion on it. --Lennlin (talk) 17:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

May i suggest put old&tang ruqun and Aoqun into separate articles? --Lennlin (talk) 17:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

• If you look at other traditional clothing articles, like the kimono and hanbok articles, they don't have seperate articles mentioning clothings of earlier dynasties. They just detail about the clothing worn in the most recent dynasty, and gloss over the history and developement of clothings worn in earlier dynasties. This is why I feel that we should concentrate more on Ming Dynasty clothing. And besides, I've already stated when I moved the page that in history, "ruqun" and "aoqun" were used interchangeably, especially after Tang Dynasty. Supersentai (talk) 01:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

It's han chinese clothing, not ming dynasty.. but anyway we shouldn't do the same or just copy off the structure of others.--24.199.98.75 (talk) 04:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

• I have edited the ruqun article to mention the history of ruqun first, followed by description of Ming dynasty ruqun. By the way, the other reason I concentrate more on Ming Dynasty clothing is because we know more facts about hanfu in Ming dynasty, compared to earlier dynasties. Supersentai (talk) 04:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

hmm it's pretty good and easier to understand compare to before. maybe we should mention Ruqun in Ming Dynasty was also call Aoqun? What you concentrating next? If you need anything just poke me in my talk page. --Lennlin (talk) 14:20, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

• Actually, upon more research, it seems that the name 'aoqun' guadually replaced 'ruqun' in Tang Dynasty, and by Song Dynasty, the name 'ruqun' is not used anymore. But both names refer to the same thing, and so for simplicity sake, let's just use 'ruqun' in the article. Supersentai (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Sure or we could mention as "(Also called Aoqun)" under the Ming Dynasty Ruqun section. Oh you should research on 曲裾服 too btw this is a good site i think for studying hanfu [8] I'm so sry that I can't read alot of Chinese letters but if you need help, just msg me --Lennlin (talk) 01:35, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

• These webpages (actually chinese forums) discuss about quju and zhiju artifacts of Han Dynasty, and re-creating these artifacts:

http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=526005765

http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=513565913

http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=509897697

http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=512978044

As you can see, most (if not all) of the Han Dynasty zhiju and quju made nowadays are not accurate at all. Supersentai (talk) 02:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

马王堆的衣服?? hmm kinda confusing. --24.199.98.75 (talk) 06:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

• Look here for 马王堆: Mawangdui Supersentai (talk) 06:41, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

okay, I'm looking forward to more innovation in this article :P , if you need help just msg me --Lennlin (talk) 18:41, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

• I'm thinking of changing the chinese names of the hanfu from simplified characters to traditional characters. Any views? Supersentai (talk) 01:13, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

:You can include both if you can but i rather stick with trad if i had to choose. Also Diyi article has been change by some korean. --24.199.98.75 (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Front Page?

Maybe we should mention the name of these clothing on the main page so users can navigate to here. --Lennlin (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Should we mention the names of each of these clothing style on the main page {Han Chinese Clothing} ? --Lennlin (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Ruqun discussion

Please join in the discussion at ruqun talk page. Supersentai (talk) 06:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

unreliable source but only korean source?

lol man every article is gonna get change and the picture are gonna get fill by so call reliable "picture" by cydevil38. All he provide is books with no link to which i can't check for reliability nor does he provide links to a Chinese or English one. Most of his source are korean basically one sided argument, not that he want to have a Chinese side here. good luck to the next @@@@ trying to change the article --Lennlin (talk) 17:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

They were properly cited so that people who can get around academic journals can find them. It doesn't seem language is an issue here, since you dispute an English source as well.[9] If you feel the sources are misinterpreted, then you may ask either a Korean or a Japanese to verify the sources. By the way, according to many other sources, foreign derivation of Chinese clothing is far more extensive. It's only natural since some influential Chinese dynasties were open to foreign trade and cultural exchange. Nonetheless, I'm just too lazy to put all that into the articles.

Also, I'd like to point out that Supersentai made other distortions as well that I'm not getting my hands on. His article on Shenyi is just among many example where information is really messed up. It is doubtful that people will get an undistorted idea of what Shenyi is and looks like from Supersentai's biased and unreliable article. Cydevil38 (talk) 01:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, I agree to a certain degree that some article are weird. Due to my busy schedules and stuff, I won't able to help the article's expansion. Well you sure know a lot about clothing, it would be good if you would expand this. Most of these articles made by Sentai were base on Ming Dynasty so it's rather confusing because some just doesn't seem to fit in the old times (due to constantly changes) . If you happens want to expand this, try research clothing before Ming Dynasty like Tang and Han (avoid Ming would be best because it just would create unwanted tension, maybeeee or not). If i happens to have times, I would consider researching Tang's [10] - [11] - [12] - [13] - [14]. (PS, There is no doubt Tang had been influence by the people (turks maybe) in Central Asian, however it's influence but it wouldn't be the kind of influence to the point like Japan during Nara. Making Every Article bear the statement (Style from central asia were popular among tang <--is highly regard as an opinion never the less the influence does make an impact but not extreme) I request it to be change or just plain statement as influence or w.e.

This looks like Banbi [15] Ps, if you would like to contact, just msg on my talk page. --Lennlin (talk) 03:20, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

According to the sources I've cited, the imported styles were completely foreign to China at the time, and the words used are "foreign derivation" or "Central Asian origin". That said, I think your picture of banbi looks more clear, so please use them for the appropriate pages if you have the time. Cydevil38 (talk) 21:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Hanfu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716121208/http://www.xici.net/b723831/d43171792.htm to http://www.xici.net/b723831/d43171792.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090709140206/http://www.jlsdaj.gov.cn/zonghe03/show.asp?id=9000 to http://www.jlsdaj.gov.cn/zonghe03/show.asp?id=9000

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Xian2-9.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Western Han kneeling female pottery figurine.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)