Talk:List of former Home and Away characters

Archives (Index)

2 1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Jacqui

Hey just wanted to let you know it's been confirmed on the official Home And Away Insta page that Jacqui Purvis is playing Felicity Newman. https://www.instagram.com/p/CSuuXrEMBVl/?utm_medium=copy_link I don't know how to edit myself. Cheers! KellanRose7 (talk) 10:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Buddy

Leaving the date for Buddy open when he hasn't appeared in over a calendar year implies that he appeared in a year when he didn't. It's all right saying he hasn't been confirmed as having left, but I'd say that not appearing anymore is a pretty big confirmation. If you don't want to have him visible with a closed date, maybe he should be commented out unless he appears again, at which point the date can be changed to "2016-2021, 2023-" or whatever's applicable? Skteosk (talk) 00:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I don't have any written references but I went on the Home and Away tour last year (Oct 22) and the tour guide said that Buddy has retired from acting as he's old now. Harrypotter1994 (talk) 15:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the info but unfortunately it won't be enough to satisfy my fellow editors! Skteosk (talk) 08:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

When will Tegan be added to the list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.71.124.135 (talk) 20:47, 27 June 2023 (UTC) I'm still waiting. 106.71.124.135 (talk) 07:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC) Geoffrey Hilliard

Well, you can always add her yourself if it's so important to you. Properly sourced, of course. Skteosk (talk) 07:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Roo Stewart

Hi everyone, I just needed to know if Roo is leaving for good or it's a temporary break. If a temporary break, I think it's better to put –2023 and insifw the edit put she is on a temporary break because of the bomb explosion that has gone off. Georgia confirmed she is having a break. Yet I haven't read the link below because it contains I assume exact spoilers for UK viewers so please let me know if anything can be done or leave it how it is! https://www.backtothebay.net/news/2023/08/04/home-and-away-spoilers-roo-leaves-summer-bay-as-john-struggles/ 2A00:23C4:F8A0:4C01:DD0C:92CC:B7F1:14A2 (talk) 09:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

It's a temporary departure for about two months so...there's no need to say she's left when she hasn't? Skteosk (talk) 08:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

I didn't know if she was leaving for good or permanent as I have not seen exact spoilers. 2A00:23C4:F8A0:4C01:547D:EF90:CB97:6BFA (talk) 20:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Merge from List of former Home and Away characters

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was… no merge. Only opposing votes have been made since the beginning of this discussion from almost three weeks ago. – Meena • 11:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

---

It's pointless to split lists of characters from a show into current and former. Eventually the show will finish and the merge will be needed. Right now the split doesn't add any value. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:03, 9 September 2023 (UTC) PS. See also currently ongoing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of former Hollyoaks characters which inspired me to start this merge and identical merge proposals at Talk:List_of_Emmerdale_characters#Merge_from_List_of_former_Emmerdale_characters, Talk:List_of_EastEnders_characters#Merge_from_List_of_former_EastEnders_characters, Talk:List_of_Doctors_characters#Merge_from_List_of_former_Doctors_characters, Talk:List_of_Coronation_Street_characters#Merge_from_List_of_former_Coronation_Street_characters, and Talk:List_of_Neighbours_characters#Merge_from_List_of_former_Neighbours_characters.

I was not in favour of removing the current characters from the old "List of Home and Away characters" article and retitling it "List of former Home and Away characters" in order to justify this page's existence and mean people had to look in two different places: We'd already come up with the compromise of highlighting current characters in a different colour so they were easy to spot. That said, I can see the advantage of having all the current characters in an easy-to-view place. I'm not sure there's a need to include a list of minor characters, many of whom haven't appeared for ages and are only included because they haven't officially left. That's what the separate years pages are for. Skteosk (talk) 08:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

@Skteosk Note that lists of minor characters have been often deleted at AfD. Merging is a good way to ensure no content will fall to the deletion axe. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

"Merging is a good way to ensure no content will fall to the deletion axe" and yet you're suggesting deletion on a Hollyoaks list as opposed to suggesting a merge which I would have happily carried out, as I have many Hollyoaks articles throughout my time on here. – Meena • 10:48, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Aha. If you did not oppose the mergers I'd actually take you up on that. But I am afraid we will have to go to AfD with all those lists. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:03, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

@Piotrus If you're not intending to get rid of minor (and often short-lived) characters, then what exactly do you expect this new list page to look like? Skteosk (talk) 10:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

@Skteosk IMHO such content is not encyclopedic. If someone merges it into one list of characters, we can probably ignore this even through it falls foul of WP:V and WP:TRIVIA and such. Otherwise, see my comment above, because GNG is an issue too. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

• Oppose why is it "pointless", is this is your personal opinion? As a soap editor, it provides readers with a differentiation between current and former characters. Due to the size of the former list, a merge would put WP:UNDUE weight. – Meena • 10:59, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
• Strong opppose – it is not pointless – it is important as it ensures that readers are aware between the difference between current and former characters. This is a long running soap opera with constantly changing characters. I disagree that it means that there is a lot of work for editors – it is not, as we are constantly updating character pages etc and we also move characters when they debut, leave, return, are upgraded to regular or recast. Usually when a character leaves an experienced editor or IP moves the character to the former list the minute the episode finishes airing. Both pages are quite big and merging them would cause the page to be too long and possibly tagged with a *too long* template, let alone it making it even harder to navigate. WP:Wikipedia is not paper – two pages (one of former and one for present) is not an issue at all and makes it easier to navigate. Also, that policy, along with Wikipedia:Article size, explains how it is important to not make pages too long/big as it affects download times and creates other issues and suggests that long tables are split off into stand alone pages. The former and present character lists have been used for decades by the soap community through excessive consensus (as I have seen through looking at a lot of the revision history etc from years ago) and this has worked well for years and never caused an issue, so I am surprised that it has been brought up now. The pages are also both fully sourced and include information about upcoming, returning and departing characters, which would be harder to put in a combined list. I also disagree with putting them all in one list if the pages are merged as that will make it much harder to see who is currently in the show. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.