Talk:List of fictional ungulates in animation
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Mediatech492 in topic Notability
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of fictional ungulates in animation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Copied edit
The horses on this list was copied from List of fictional horses. Ncboy2010 (talk) 16:17, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Notability edit
@Mediatech492: I removed those entries from the list because the entries primarily because either had no explanation of their notability, were not mentioned even in passing in their respective pages, or both.--Mr Fink (talk) 04:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- So your only justification was on the basis of your own opinion. That is not sufficent. Mediatech492 (talk) 14:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Then, could you at least give some enhanced criteria for quality control and notability so the page won't appear as a hybrid laundry list turned dumping ground?--Mr Fink (talk) 14:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia criteria for notability. WP:N Note that notability for content is dependent on the source itself, not the the Wikipedia article on the source. Mediatech492 (talk) 16:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Then, could you at least give some enhanced criteria for quality control and notability so the page won't appear as a hybrid laundry list turned dumping ground?--Mr Fink (talk) 14:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)