Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Philip Seymour Hoffman
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Refs needed edit
Hello folks! We need some refs here, someone keeps just arbitrarily removing sections, so it's best if we can add some refs to stop that happening. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I think this is an important article for actor accolades and if anything would be worth getting up to FL status. To delete it is just poor editing and essentially vandalism.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Nothing arbitrary at all. WP:BLP still applies to Hoffman, and WP:BURDEN applies to all editors. If you want to restore information that has been removed for being unsourced, then an inline citation is absolutely mandatory. Not optional at all.—Kww(talk) 20:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- It's all been restored, good news! We have plenty of refs, which anyone could have found in two seconds, so plenty to go by. We have a tag asking for more refs, so any more blanking will taken as a sign of deliberate vandalism! By the way, claiming that "an inline citation is absolutely mandatory" is actually not mentioned anywhere in WP:BLP and WP:BURDEN. So please stop claiming that, it's a lie. By the way, I can see you have a taste for this, would you let me know which other lists you're going to destroy in your self-imposed challenge, just so I can spend two seconds finding the odd source? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I have challenged the veracity of the list, The Rambling Man, meaning that the requirements for needing inline citations have been met. You have not supplied sources for this material, by the way. A quick spot check shows that references for many of the awards still aren't there: Georgia and North Carolina, for example. Do not repeat this kind of behaviour: never restore challenged material to an article without an inline citation supporting your change.—Kww(talk) 20:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- You're wrong. You have no policy backing your position. Never do this again. Stop edit-warring, stop removing the information, if you must, tag it, but stop doing what you're doing, it's really unhelpful. I'm trying hard to get some more refs in, and all you're doing is delete content. Honestly I've never seen anything so disruptive from such an editor. Has your account been compromised? The Rambling Man (talk) 21:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I have challenged the veracity of the list, The Rambling Man, meaning that the requirements for needing inline citations have been met. You have not supplied sources for this material, by the way. A quick spot check shows that references for many of the awards still aren't there: Georgia and North Carolina, for example. Do not repeat this kind of behaviour: never restore challenged material to an article without an inline citation supporting your change.—Kww(talk) 20:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- It's all been restored, good news! We have plenty of refs, which anyone could have found in two seconds, so plenty to go by. We have a tag asking for more refs, so any more blanking will taken as a sign of deliberate vandalism! By the way, claiming that "an inline citation is absolutely mandatory" is actually not mentioned anywhere in WP:BLP and WP:BURDEN. So please stop claiming that, it's a lie. By the way, I can see you have a taste for this, would you let me know which other lists you're going to destroy in your self-imposed challenge, just so I can spend two seconds finding the odd source? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Stepping in here to,repeat what I've written elsewhere: BLP does NOT apply here: PSH's death is not "recent" in the BLP sense. Yes, these things need to be sourced, but not deleted while the refs are being added. – SchroCat (talk) 22:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Still searching edit
So I've moved the following here until we can find a reference for them... The Rambling Man (talk) 09:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
| Year | Category | Film | Result | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | London Film Critics' Circle Award for Actor of the Year | Flawless | Nominated | |
| 2000 | Chicago Film Critics Association Award for Best Supporting Actor | Almost Famous | Nominated | |
| 2000 | London Film Critics' Circle Award for Actor of the Year | Almost Famous | Nominated | |
| 2005 | New York Film Critics Circle Award for Best Actor | Capote | Nominated | |
| 2005 | St. Louis Gateway Film Critics Association Award for Best Actor | Capote | Nominated | |
| 2007 | Houston Film Critics Society for Best Supporting Actor | Charlie Wilson's War | Nominated | |
| 2007 | St. Louis Gateway Film Critics Association Award for Best Supporting Actor | Charlie Wilson's War | Nominated |
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of awards and nominations received by Philip Seymour Hoffman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150321230150/http://texasartfilm.com/2012hfcsnominations.html to http://texasartfilm.com/2012hfcsnominations.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:40, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of awards and nominations received by Philip Seymour Hoffman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150416122310/http://www.chicagofilmcritics.org/1998-2006 to http://www.chicagofilmcritics.org/1998-2006
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6E5ADBn3O?url=http://www.chicagofilmcritics.org/awards/92-2012-chicago-film-critics-awards to http://www.chicagofilmcritics.org/awards/92-2012-chicago-film-critics-awards
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)