Talk:List of archives in Canada

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Jackiespeel in topic City of Cambridge Archives

Scope and direction of page

edit

The featured list criteria is a good road map to use as this page develops. An intro about archives in Canada and a scope for the types of archives are going to be needed so that there's a sense of what should be added to the page. For example, digital archives and historical societies should (maybe) sit within their own lists like those for museums, libraries and genealogical societies. And how will archival institutions without an online presence be handled in terms of verifiability, etc.? Could they be referenced with a link to a list of archives on which they appear or to the AtoM record in the provincial/territorial institutional records repository? - Dnllnd (talk) 23:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Danielle, I'm not sure if you were trying to limit the number of "types" of institutions but in adding the AGO, I didn't think any of the existing categories were a great fit -- and presumably there are other arts orgs to be added. Thanks for initiating this page! Artchivist1 (talk) 16:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hi! No, the types were less an attempt to limit things than a jumping off point to get the ball rolling. It probably makes sense to try and scope things to some degree, but art orgs weren't well represented, so it's great to see the addition! - Dnllnd (talk) 22:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Linking

edit

What are people's thoughts on external linking to archives? I think that links should go to the section of a website where information about the archives, collections, etc are outlined. This approach minimizes having to find it and provides a better idea of what's available to end users. -Dnllnd (talk) 13:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I can't find any reference to an archives or local history collection on the websites of Teeterville or Delhi. -- Zanimum (talk) 13:26, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Zanimum: I find the absences tough to read! It's impossible to tell if there's no web presence because there aren't resources in place to have one or is there's no web presence because the archives has been closed. Dnllnd (talk) 14:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of archives in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference library not an archives, agreed?

edit

Hi all. Would everyone agree that most reference libraries are not archives, with the exception of things like Thomas Fischer Rare Books? Why I ask, Bytown Museum seemingly only has a library. -- Zanimum (talk) 13:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of archives in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:28, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of archives in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Checking through the links from the equivalent Archiverdict Wiki page I am finding a certain amount of linkrot etc: I have made a few changes for the A and B entries so far, but it looks as if much needs updating on this list. (Feel free to make use of the wiki if more convenient.) Jackiespeel (talk) 17:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Now up to L - a certain amount of updating of the links on the WP page will be necessary. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:19, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion for development

edit

Could the information be re-presented in this format [1] - ie a list divided up by (Canadian) Province: would be much easier to keep in alphabetical order as changes are made. Jackiespeel (talk) 00:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Anglican Church of Canada archives

edit

Perhaps the various entries could be brought together on a separate page (or as a subsection of the ACC article)? Jackiespeel (talk) 16:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

City of Cambridge Archives

edit

'Is 'Cambridge Archives and Records Centre Cambridge' the same as 'City of Cambridge Archives] - website [2]? Jackiespeel (talk) 18:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply