Talk:List of aircraft of the Royal New Zealand Air Force and Royal New Zealand Navy

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of aircraft of the Royal New Zealand Air Force and Royal New Zealand Navy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

I have some photos to put here edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I went to Whenuapai on the weekend and have some good photos of aircraft which could help this page so I wil put them on here. I am new to Wikipedia, so I have to wait until I get 10 edits befpre I can do the uploads. Although I am new, I have a friend who has been on wikipedia for sometime who is telling me how to upload. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenkeeper (talk • contribs) 20:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC) (Sorry, I forgot to put the tildes Greenkeeper (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC))Reply

Spud One edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Boeing 727 says 'The 727 that carried New Zealand Prime Minister Jim Bolger was known as Spud One.' The link for 'Spud One' comes here but there is no mention of it here. Is 'Spud One' a proper usage (similar to the US Air Force One or was it juts a once off joke? Stepho talk 04:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Confused listings makes for ease-of-use issues edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have a serious issue with the way that both the lists of RNZAF registrations and year-to-year dates they served are almost the same construction on the page — a set of numbers separated from another set by a dash. This isn't really good enough.

The other issue is that, for a serious researcher, the manufacturer's construction numbers are missing from the listings. A serious deficiency. Lin (talk) 04:00, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic