Talk:List of V for Vendetta characters
 | Valerie Page was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 01 June 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of V for Vendetta characters. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| Storm Saxon was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 May 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of V for Vendetta characters. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on August 27, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled edit
Should this be a mix between the movie and the graphic novel? What do you think the scope should be? --P-Chan 20:22, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Title/layout edit
- Needs to be changed to List of characters in V for Vendetta
- V and Evey should be first, with a link to their main articles.Cvene64 06:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- Those changes sound good. I have a question that I never asked anyone yet. Should we have it so that the we have a common page that mixes the film and the novel characters side-by-side or should we have two seperate pages for characters? I think it would be less hassle in terms of setting up pages if we did seperate (we'd just fill in the blanks). If we had them mixed, it would be harder, but there may be the potential to create a much sleeker looking product in the end. I'm 100% open to either. --P-Chan 07:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- I say we keep it as one. Having two could just be repeating ourselves. Although..Having one creates a bit of a conflict..aka..should we have a comic or film image..hmm..Cvene64 09:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, did not quite explain that. There is currently two images for each character. This cannot stay, as it would most definately violate Fair-use. Cvene64 09:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Eric Finch edit
The article of Eric Finch appears to have been merged with the main V for Vendetta page. The bulk of information on him seems to have been lost. Also, wouldn't it have been more logical to have merged it with this page that has no information on this important character at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.222.56 (talk) 08:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Links? edit
No pages link to this page. It is hard to access. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.222.56 (talk) 20:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Creedy.jpg edit
Image:Creedy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Dascombe.jpg edit
Image:Dascombe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I think if Helen Heyer is deserving of her own write-up then so is Rosemary Almond. She has as much, if not more exposure and plays a vital role in the climax. - Jeremiah Hicks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.252.209 (talk) 10:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)