Talk:List of DreamWorks Animation productions/Archive 1

Semi-protected edit request on 18 July 2018

{{subst:trim|1=

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Danski454 (talk) 12:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2019

It's been confirmed that the "Where's Waldo" TV series will premiere on July 20th, not Fall. 2600:1700:7D0:4D90:D0C0:AB84:8E78:EFC8 (talk) 16:13, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:16, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Films in development

Given WP:CRYSTAL, specifically:

• Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place.

and

• Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors.

and that films "in development" aren't guaranteed to enter production, should such projects be included here if they have not entered production or have no scheduled release date? Trivialist (talk) 02:58, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

New TV series

Despicable Me and The Secret Life of Pets will be the TV series by DreamWorks Animation Television. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.87.176.115 (talk) 17:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Is Netflix's VeggieTales made by DWA?

I thought it was was...

Until today.

Now I need explications. I saw the credits but it was just Big Idea. And also at least I had a reason to remove VeggieTales in the House and ... in the City. Andrei Bondoc (talk) 10:27, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 October 2019

Zoe Goes on RePlay 98.21.197.8 (talk) 18:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:52, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2020

Bold text Limboed Movies Me and My Shadow Shrek 5 Puss in Boots 2 Spooky Jack Mumbai Musical B.O.O, Bureau of Otherworldly Operations Bold text Cancelled Movies Antz 2 Zodiac Croods Awakening Larrikins Rockumentary Sevak Zeinalian (talk) 04:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Aasim 05:57, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 June 2020

Because there is things that I know are incorrect, and I want to make them right and make wikipedia a reliable source, because teachers today don't think wikipedia is a reliable source Sevak Zeinali (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. TheImaCow (talk) 06:09, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

"The Bad Guys (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Bad Guys (upcoming film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 17#The Bad Guys (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Starzoner (talk) 10:51, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 February 2021

I would like to have myself edit this page please. Intern2021 (talk) 20:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC) I would like to have myself edit this page please.

@Intern2021: You may edit semi-protected pages like this when your account becomes autoconfirmed. This usually happens when you have at least 10 edits and your account is at least 4 days old. See WP:AUTOC for more info. RudolfRed (talk) 20:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Intern2021 is a sock puppet account of Intern2020, a user who was permanently banned recently for repeated vandalism. They shouldn’t be editing anything. --Jkaharper (talk) 22:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 February 2021

Ronan Boyle should also be an in development film as it was announced by Variety and is to be directed by Fergal Reilly. Ameryder23456789011 (talk) 01:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 03:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 February 2021 (2)

Spirit Riding Free under the Specials section should be removed since under that logic, every special DreamWorks has made for their series should be there. To: Gerard, Tiny Diamond Goes To School, The Abominable short and the two new Croods: A New Age home media shorts should also be under the shorts section. Ameryder23456789011 (talk) 18:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: I'm not sure I understand your justification. Please also put this in X to Y form. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 March 2021

Yokai Samba should be removed from the In Development schedule as it's now being developed by Nickelodeon. Also the short "To: Gerard" should be here. Ameryder23456789011 (talk) 00:51, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — TGHL ↗ (talk) 02:08, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 March 2021

Change the short films to include “show and tell(Abominable)”, “Tiny Diamond goes back to School(Trolls:World Tour)” “To:Gerald(peacock and The Croods:A New Age)” “Dear Diary:Worlds first Pranks” and “Little red Bronana Bread”(both from the Croods:A New Age)

Edit the release date for “Tales of Arcadia:Trollhunters:Rise of the Titans” to July, 2021 2601:681:4402:9780:8CC7:BBF8:B43D:2ABB (talk) 21:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Please provide sourcing for these changes. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2021

I'm sorry if I'm sounding like a broken record, but To: Gerard should be under the Shorts section. Also, both Spirit Untamed and How To Train Your Dragon: Homecoming are animated by Jellyfish Pictures. Much of the crew from both productions had confirmed this through last year's Annie Awards with HTTYD: Homecoming and through social media with Spirit Untamed.

Write your request ABOVE this line and do not remove the tildes and curly brackets below. --> Ameryder23456789011 (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

You need to provide reliable sourcing for this before we'll make the edits. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:37, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 May 2021

Pacific Data Images 2603:7000:C702:7400:2D8F:9E53:6661:604 (talk) 20:38, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2021

add Pacific Data Images to the co-production column 24.90.53.51 (talk) 18:23, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:24, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Missing a movie

This is missing the 2000 DreamWorks film "Joseph: King of Dreams" Elyon127 (talk) 19:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Since "Joseph: King of Dreams" is a direct-to-video film, you'll find it under the "Direct-to-Video" section of the article. Red4Smash (talk) 21:31, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 September 2021

Zj Sanchez Javier (talk) 03:16, 29 September 2021 (UTC)hi

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — IVORK _Talk 04:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2021

I want to edit this list as well, please. If not, please let me know. 20doyld (talk) 19:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC) 20doyld (talk) 19:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2021

Composer(s) 2603:7000:C300:862F:204A:FAF4:12E5:3440 (talk) 21:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Ongoing article content dispute

I am here to address and hopefully solve an ongoing content dispute regarding the table layout on this article:

• One side, including myself, agrees that the articles should be consistent with each other, as the Manual of Style says, and that it is easier to navigate seperate templates.
• The other side says that it is best to have the information be combined into one big table, and saying that the other articles are "poor quality", despite the fact that the articles are not really that poor in quality and this page is of the same quality of those.

Let's solve this here before becoming pointy. Blubabluba9990 (talk) (contribs) 18:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

I will ping those involved here: @Maxbmogs, Drmies, and ZX2006XZ: Blubabluba9990 (talk) (contribs) 18:24, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

We need it combined since we wanna know how the budget works well for DreamWorks and their films. Removing them won’t make any sense for this issue. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

We should have it be like the other pages. --Maxbmogs (talk) 22:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Direct-To-Videos

We can’t make it like Sony Pictures Animation does. We need it to stand out from the rest. We keep them but not to put them on the released section. Those are just for those who have been released on the big screen. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 17:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

IMDB scores are not allowed

The Reception table in this article is an awful eyesore, (see {{Overcolored}}) and the unnecessary colors should be removed. A much bigger problem is that it fails the core principle of Wikipedia:Verfiability and the table is not properly sourced, it isn't sourced at all, not even one reference!

A more immediate and easier to solve problem is that it includes user votes from IMDB. WP:USERGENERATED content such as audience scores from Rotten Tomatoes or IMDB are not allowed, there are fundamentally not WP:Reliable sources.
The entire IMDB scores column should be removed ASAP. -- 109.78.192.128 (talk) 23:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Please remove the table List_of_DreamWorks_Animation_productions#Critical_reception as it is entirely {{unsourced}}. (On top of that IMDB scores should not have be included even if they had been properly sourced, WP:USERGENERATED and it is an ugly {{Overcolored}} abomination.) -- 109.79.167.3 (talk) 23:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Please note Wikipedia:Verifiability is a core policy of Wikipedia. In particular it says

• "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material
• "Any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation"

You could chose to tag the table it as {{unsourced section}} and wait but it is unlikely to work, and I feel it absolutely necessary to remove the table until such time as editors are actually willing to provide proper references. (I tried that before with List of Blue Sky Studios productions but years later still the Rotten Tomatoes scores are not sourced, except the one reference I added as an example.) There are simply too many low quality list articles that no one seems to have any interest in properly maintaining. -- 109.79.167.3 (talk) 23:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

I tracked down the diff the Reception table was only recently added top this article in February 2022. All the colors, none of the references. -- 109.79.72.233 (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

User:Indagate removed the IMDB scores[1] thank you.

Unsourced section should be removed

The table is still entirely {{unsourced}} and horribly {{overcolored}} and I still believe it would be best if it was removed, and not restored until it is reliably sourced. -- 109.79.72.233 (talk) 05:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Please change:

• X the subsection "Critical reception"
• to Y "" ie nothing, remove it.

Strictly follow the request format specified by the template, just in case that makes any difference. TLDR: Please remove this recently addeddiff unsourced information entirely. -- 109.78.204.188 (talk) 03:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

In progress: An editor is implementing the requested edit. ★Ama ^{TALK CONTRIBS} 14:40, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

 Done as the section was unsourced and also highly variable (most likely changes frequently) ★Ama ^{TALK CONTRIBS} 14:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

 Undone: This request has been undone. Editor ZX2006XZ reverted my edit, see discussion entry below. ★Ama ^{TALK CONTRIBS} 15:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Changed assessment

Hello everyone, I've changed the assessments on the projects to List instead of Start-class, considering it's very obviously a list "List of..." and has the WikiProject Lists linked as well. I did this since it seemed to me like an uncontroversial edit. If anyone disagrees feel free to change it again or start a discussion about it here, but please do provide arguments if you do so. ★Ama ^{TALK CONTRIBS} 19:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

@ZX2006XZ:

Hey, I noticed you undid my revision regarding the critical reception section.

While I agree in principal that we need such a section, the section as it was (and now is again) is created entirely unsourced and by a user who has an undeclared COI, I'm presently making a report to WP:COIN about this so please hold off on reverting my edit for now, if that's okay. If you'd prefer we could also add a notice pointing towards the potential COI. I'll await your response here or on my Talk page or wherever really. ★Ama ^{TALK CONTRIBS} 15:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Well, it looks like we'll have to source the critical reception, then, instead of just removing it completely. ZX2006XZ (talk) 15:04, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

@ZX2006XZ: Sourcing is probably not enough since all of the information will be dated before you know it anyway, unless you personally want to get rid of all of the manual of style disasters the section suffers from as well, I suggest leaving my edit in place. I won't edit war over it though, if you insist I'll concede to leave it like this and perhaps request RfC for further comments from other editors to establish consensus. Let me know what you think. ★Ama ^{TALK CONTRIBS} 15:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Sources added and colour removed @Amadeus1999 Indagate (talk) 18:36, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

@Indagate: Neat! ★Ama ^{TALK CONTRIBS} 19:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you all for improving the article. I have no objections to the section existing in principle so long as it is properly sourced, but frankly it should not have been added without sources in the first place and it was necessary to remove it completely to make this happen. I am glad to see it now has proper inline references. There are simply too many low quality poorly sourced list articles to tag them as "unsourced" and hope for the best. There are too many editors following bad examples in good faith, Wikipedia too often fails to follow its own rules, even core principles like verification. Maybe it should not be necessary to take hard line on removing unsourced content but years of unreferenced section banners and citation needed tags suggest it is necessary. WP:V is clear, the burden lies on editors who add or restore. (The fact that some editors and fans hide user scores mixed in with critic scores means that all of the Reception information especially needs to clearly verified. Why don't I help fix these list articles? I've spent time trying to improve low quality list articles before only to see them deleted anyway, and I usually direct my efforts to prose articles.) I do not see the scores being slightly out of date being a problem, scores tend not to change much anyway once they have a decent number of reviews, and so long as there are references allowing readers and editor to easily verify them. (I absolutely and unequivocally reject the overcoloring and I appreciate that it was not added again.) Thanks for making a better encyclopedia. -- 109.79.73.24 (talk) 17:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

No producers or EP

This list needs to be simple. We can't add anything else from producer and Exective producers since some films didn't have some people credited as Executive producers. The list needs to only have Directors and Composers without making it like the others. I'm sorry if this is not how you guys like it but it needs to stay simple and fresh without making a mess or an edit war about it. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 20:09, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Pacific Data Images

Would Pacific Data Images count as a production company for this article. They are credited on films such as Shrek and Madagascar. ZX2006XZ (talk) 21:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC) @SlySabre and BMA-Nation2020: ZX2006XZ (talk) 21:47, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

We need to debate on this. We can’t credit it as PDI/DreamWorks since they’re animated by the same company. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 22:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Q: column totals?

Howard from NYC (talk) 18:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC) Q: is there any reason for not including column totals?

Untitled PinyPon Movie

Michelle as Taylor Swift "PINY" Coming Summer 2023! 2800:810:58D:A589:507B:A67C:5A97:B2BB (talk) 15:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Dreamworks list of movies

Joseph: King of Dreams was a dreamworks movie and needs adding to this list 94.197.204.182 (talk) 00:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Table

This table needs to not have any producers and executive producers. Some films didn’t have any executive producers credited. It needs to be back where it belongs. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 16:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

@Indagate @Gouleg this table feels like it’s uncomfortable for me to handle. There’s too much wide space and not every dreamworks film is executive produced. I prefer we kept the directors and composers credited and not the producers and executive producers. This credit thing is still bothering me due to logic and my Autism. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 19:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

I do agree with you that the current table is very cluttered right now, but try to come up with a proposal and see what other editors have to say about the table on the talk page before modifying it. However, I don't want to be involved in the Dreamworks table this time as I was with the Illumination table -Gouleg🛋️ ^harass/_hound 19:38, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Based on what's notable enough for infoboxes of individual films, executive prouducer and animation service columns seem unnecessary. Should have a writer column as they are important part of film production, 2nd top field in infoboxes of individual films. Indagate (talk) 21:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

animation services are neesscairy. not every film is animated by DreamWorks. but i arrge with the EP thing. the writer column would be tricky. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 23:07, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Why are animation services necessary to note in this table if not necessary to note in infoboxes?

Also, why would writer column be tricky? New column after director same as Illumination. If space is concern, then remove animation services, then if more space needed remove composer or distribuor. Indagate (talk) 06:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

nvm. I managed to make a new table for director, producer and writer. Keeping composers and distrubtors with the companys that helped maked the films possible. I did as you asked and improved it. Some dreamworks films have songs invovled from Prince of Egypt to El Dorado to Over the Hedge. I hope you don’t mind. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 17:52, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Also, pinging @NekoKatsun as involved in discussion about Illumination table Indagate (talk) 21:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

User:BMA-Nation2020/sandbox III it took a while but i managed to make a prototype out of it. What do you think @Indagate and @NekoKatsun? BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 01:57, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 September 2022

Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 01:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi, My name is Spino-Soar-Us and I will like to submit an edit request for the article List of Dreamworks Animation Productions. I know that I am new to Wikipedia, but I have already added some images to other pages and fixed some minor errors on the page. I can see that there are some minor errors on this page and I would like to fix those errors. I know that I could be helpful, so I ask that I could edit this article.

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Cannolis (talk) 01:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Feature films section.

Hello, @Indagate:. My name is ZX2006XZ. There has been some problems with the feature films section of this article. One major problem is the split between "theatrical" and "direct-to-video" films. I don't see why Joseph: King of Dreams, the direct-to-video film in question, should have a separate section of its own when it is DreamWorks' only direct-to-video film, and Trolls World Tour was released on video-on-demand due to COVID-19. Additionally, The Boss Baby: Family Business got a simultaneous theatrical/Peacock release.

The other big issue is how the animation services for DreamWorks' films are in the Distribution/Co-production with section. It doesn't make sense, because it would make it as of Jellyfish Pictures was a co-production company on Spirit Untamed, Family Business, and The Bad Guys when Jellyfish Pictures only provided the animation.

Also, I don't understand how the numbers are unnecessary.

So, I decided to reinstate the animation services section and put Joseph: King of Dreams where the rest of the movies are. Additionally, I am adding an "also production company" note to Pacific Data Images as they co-produced Antz, the Shrek and Madagascar movies, among others.

ZX2006XZ (talk) 13:55, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for starting discussion, but please do not restore a bold edit while discussion is in progress, the status quo should remain while consensus is formed against it.

"Direct-to-video" vs. theatrical is an important distinction in film in terms of notability, your other examples also released theatrically.

I see numbers as unnecessary because the films are not connected, they're listed in release order by default so labelling their number of release is useless information. How are they necessary?

You've not mentioned why remove scope="row", they're for MOS:DTAB

Note next to Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit was broken.

Thanks, Indagate (talk) 19:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

I can see where you are coming from when it comes to the numbers. However, Joseph: King of Dreams is DreamWorks'only direct-to-video film to date. It's not like DreamWorks has more direct-to-video films. Also, I am going to fix the note for Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit. Additionally, the animation services section is gone, so I'm re-adding that. ZX2006XZ (talk) 21:31, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Please stop restoring your bold edit, use this talk page to generate consensus for your bold edit before restoring it. You've not mentioned why remove scope="row", they're for MOS:DTAB. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Okay. So what if we remove the numbers, but keep the scope="row" and the animation services section, and also discard the direct-to-video section? ZX2006XZ (talk) 21:44, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

table

to @Indagate, i'm sorry about what i did and seems like the only thing that would work is if the film credits what it's based on. Need to make sure to keep my eyes out of those if possible. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 22:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Split the accolades

DreamWorks Animation had many awards and nominations, so I think the list is long enough to be split. It would help maintain the focus of this article as well. MegaSmike46 (talk) 02:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

• Support – I think so but it would be possible to move them out of the production list and into a separate page. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2022

can i add more references or fixing typo guys pls? thank you CarlMaga (talk) 23:53, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Colonestarrice (talk) 04:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 December 2022

It is confirmed the director of Kung Fu Panda 4 will be Joel Crawford Superbois235 (talk) 14:32, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Also, "Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken" is misspelled as "Ruby Gillman: Teenage Cracken", and Trolls Band Together sends you to Trolls: World Tour for some reason. 23.176.32.114 (talk) 04:31, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Sorry I keep adding to this but, one last thing. It's been confirmed the budget of The Bad Guys was 70 million USD and the budget of Antz was 105 million. (I found the KFP4 director thing off of a shady DreamWorks leak site and the unofficial DreamWorks Fandom, it might not be true but based off of his previous work, I wouldn't doubt it.) (I found the budgets off of Box Office Mojo, still can't find the budget for Trolls 2 though...) 23.176.32.114 (talk) 04:46, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2023

In the Accolades section of the article, change Puss in Boots: The Last Wish’s status from pending to nominated in light of the 95th Academy Awards giving Best Animated Feature to Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio. Please move along (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done Actualcpscm (talk) 17:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

References

DreamWorks Animation Flims

Here are the DreamWorks Animation Flims Antz (1998) The Prince of Egypt (1998) The Road to El Dorado (2000) Chicken Run (2000) Joseph: King of Dreams (2000) Shrek (2001) Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron (2002) Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas (2003) Shrek 2 (2004) Shark Tale (2004) Madagascar (2005) Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were–Rabbit (2005) Over the Hedge (2006) Flushed Away (2006) Shrek the Third (2007) Bee Movie (2007) Kung Fu Panda (2008) Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa (2008) Monsters Vs Aliens (2009) How To Train Your Dragon (2010) Megamind (2010) Kung Fu Panda 2 (2011) Puss in Boots (2011) Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted (2012) Rise of the Guardians (2012) The Croods (2013) Turbo (2013) Mr. Peabody and Sherman (2014) How To Train Your Dragon 2 (2014) Penguins of Madagascar (2014) Home (2015) Trolls (2016) The Boss Baby (2017) Captain Underpants: The First Epic Movie (2017) How To Train Your Dragon 3: The Hidden World (2019) Abominable (2019) Trolls 2: World Tour (2020) The Croods 2: A New Age (2020) Spirit Untamed (2021) The Boss Baby 2: Family Business (2021) The Bad Guys (2022) Puss in Boots: The Last Wish (2022) Trolls 3: Band Together (2023) TBA (2024) Kung Fu Panda 4 (2024) TBA (2024) 176.254.59.203 (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Shouldn’t the Trollhunters movie also be on this list? 198.200.115.29 (talk) 01:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Trollhunters

Why is Trollhunters: Rise of the Titans not in the list? 198.200.115.29 (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 June 2023

Ruby Gillman's out now. I need to put it up on the released films. 64.56.17.172 (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 04:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

But it's June 30. 64.56.17.172 (talk) 04:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 June 2023 (2)

Orion and the Dark is said to be produced by Peter McCown while Walt Dohrn and Bonnie Arnold are executive producing the film. 64.56.17.172 (talk) 05:13, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

References

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The reference given, already in the table, does not support the information you have given. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 05:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

But this is a relatable source: https://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/orion-and-the-dark-dreamworks-netflix-charlie-kaufman-229594.html It may look the same but confirms who's producing it. Peter McCown is confirmed to be the producer of the film.

 Done Xan747 (talk) 23:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Ruby Gillman Reception Info

Since Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken has been out for a while, we should add its box office and critical response info into the Reception section of the article. Red4Smash (talk) 16:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Is the Shrek spin-off focusing on Donkey still happening?

I don't see the planned Shrek spin-off focusing on Donkey being visable in the section of "Films in development." Is the spin-off still happening, was it just a rumor or was it just a misunderstanding and that no such spin-off is in development? JMATIUAS (talk) 17:46, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2024

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_DreamWorks_Animation_productions&diff=prev&oldid=1195413812 Needs to be reverted from ZX2006XZ. He must not put the direct-to-videos on the list because they don’t count. A direct-to-video section is needed for Orion and the Dark. If he keeps this up he will cause an edit war on other users. Please accept this edit request as a reason we don’t want his actions effecting this page. He does not need to be like the List of Sony Pictures Animation productions. 107.77.197.112 (talk) 18:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. In a case like this IP, it is best to start a discussion here, providing an explanation of your rationale for why the two movie types should be separate on this article, and then allow the community to engage. -- Pinchme123 (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

And he keeps deleting Madagascar 4 off the list of upcoming movies in development. Tom McGrath did say it was in the works April 2017. Sure, we haven't heard anything yet, but that's no reason to delete it. He keeps doing it again and doesn't know when to stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ggianoli (talk • contribs) 02:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Animation services section

Now that Dog Man has been dated for 2025, I say that it's time to restore the animation services section, especially since Orion and the Dark is coming out Friday. The animation services have no reason to be in the same column as the distributors. ZX2006XZ (talk) 00:04, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Update: I just added an animation services section to the upcoming section. Now it's time for released section to get the makeover it deserves. ZX2006XZ (talk) 00:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)