Talk:List of AMD processors with 3D graphics

GPU architecture

edit

As can be read here: Graphics_hardware_and_FOSS#ATI.2FAMD there are a couple of GPU microarchitectures, the latest being Terascale, VLIW5, VLIW4 and GCN (Graphics Core Next). It would be nice, if the architecture would be named in this and also in other articles, e.g. Jaguar (microarchitecture), List of AMD Accelerated Processing Unit microprocessors, etc.

Semsi Paco Virchow (talk) 18:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bobcat G-series

edit

I heard a rumor the video capability of the G-series might have less capabilities. If you find any proof, please post a link to it, and correct this article. • SbmeirowTalk02:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Base frequency/Multiplier change

edit

While AMD's processors have traditionally used a 200MHz base clock, and still do for AM3+ socket processors, their fusion processors should have switched to using a 100MHz base clock. Multiple tech review websites have shown the processors to have a 100MHz base clock. I personally own a desktop Llano CPU and at 2600MHz clock it has a multiplier of 26x, not 13x. Hopefully someone can correct this as I am too inexperienced in finding and linking sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.169.92.18 (talk) 18:43, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Trinity Bias

edit

The notes that have been placed below the trinity section of the article have been written in a bias and inflammatory manner. While the points may indeed be correct, the section needs a re-write along with appropriate references if the claims are substantiated. The argument could also be made that these comments are not warranted at all on this page as it is essentially a technical list. Noslyl (talk) 16:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

new upcoming APUs

edit

http://heise.de/-1791255 -- 217.245.131.137 (talk) 14:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

-- Integrated into the Desktop processors section of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.164.80 (talk) 16:25, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

E2-1800 32 nm

edit

As per http://products.amd.com/pages/NotebookAPUDetail.aspx?detailId=39&id=21&id=39&id=61 the E2-1800 is in 32 nm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrSeehas (talkcontribs) 07:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

PS4 APU for desktop

edit

Apparently AMD is making a PS4 APU for the desktop. It looks like the PS4 is a Jaguar based CPU with 8 Cores running at 2GHZ & 1120 Stream Processors from what I read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.50.139.54 (talk) 18:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

X2 340X

edit

Hi!

1st: I'm working at a computer store.
I have a boxed FM2 processor in my hand, witch ain't listed here, and if I google for it I only find webshops who also sell it... o.O

Name:
AMD Athlon™ X2 340X
Writen on the CPU:
AD340XOKA23HJ
Diffused in Germany
Made in China
Writen on the BOX:
AD340XOKHJBOX
3.2GHz
3.6GHz Turbo core
1.0 MB Total Cache

Fura Alak (talk) 09:03, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

That processor has the same part number as the AMD Athlon X2 340, which is already included in the Trinity section of the Desktop microprocessors. There doesn't seem to be a listing on CPU World for the X2 340X. Do you have any sources that confirm this is a different part? DElliott (talk) 08:31, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
I don't have other sources then the Box itself in my hand... The part number are the same, but they name differs, and the X2 340 should have 2 × 2 MB L2, but this box states the X2 340X has "1.0 MB Total Cache", ergo 2 × 0.5 MB L2... Weird.
I can only check the CPU if someone do buy it, and ask me to build it into a PC by myself, because it's owned by the company I do work for.
Fura Alak (talk) 06:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

more Virgo/Trinity APUs

edit

A lot of Trinity APUs are missing, look here for a complete table from AMD: http://www.amd.com/de/products/desktop/processors/a-series/Pages/a-series-model-number-comparison.aspx -- 80.245.147.81 (talk) 07:37, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

So please insert them into the article. --DrSeehas (talk) 07:45, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
sorry, my fault - these are the older Llano APUs... -- 80.245.147.81 (talk) 07:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
;-)
PS: Gruss an das Bundesamt fuer Finanzen --DrSeehas (talk) 07:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

So why do you keep deleting supported features added by me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emperor-Overlord100 (talkcontribs) 23:15, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your question is repeatedly answered in my edit comments. Just read them (and read your own talk page). --DrSeehas (talk) 06:48, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

No Carrizo

edit

AMD confirmed this chip in 2013 already for this year. Is there no more info on it yet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.13.52.245 (talk) 00:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Godavari/Godavari Pro APUs

edit

I've noticed a few new AMD APUs that are in some places listed as "Godavari" and "Godavari PRO" APUs, which I believe are the desktop versions of the "Carrizo" and "Carrizo PRO" APUs. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar enough with Wikipedia to know how to create a new section & list for them (I just do minor edits). I've found the following in the HP EliteDesk 705 G2 systems (some links aren't available in English, apologies) :

AMD PRO A10-8850B APU with Radeon™ R7 Graphics (3.9 GHz up to 4.1 GHz, 4 MB cache, 4 cores) [1]

AMD PRO A10-8750B APU with Radeon™ R7 Graphics (3.6 GHz up to 4 GHz, 4 MB cache, 4 cores) [2]

AMD PRO A8-8650B APU with Radeon™ R7 Graphics (3.2 GHz up to 3.9 GHz, 4 MB cache, 4 cores) [3]

AMD PRO A6-8550B APU with Radeon™ R5 Graphics (3.7 GHz up to 4 GHz, 1 MB cache, 2 cores) [4]

AMD PRO A4-8350B APU with Radeon™ R5 Graphics (3.5 GHz up to 3.9 GHz, 1 MB cache, 2 cores) [5]


- Extec286 (talk) 23:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Godavari is just an updated Kaveri, still using the "Steamroller" microarchitecture, while Carrizo uses the newer "Excavator" microarchitecture. It's hard to tell Godavari and Kaveri apart other than their desktop part numbers end in C and A, respectively. Since the difference is so small I don't feel it is worth adding as a separate table. --Vossanova o< 21:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Should it just be added to the Kaveri table, then? - Extec286 (talk) 21:22, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of AMD accelerated processing unit microprocessors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 29 external links on List of AMD accelerated processing unit microprocessors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

APU without GPU?

edit

See Feature overview table: "Carrizo/FM2+ - No APU models. Athlon X4 845 only". Now see "Carrizo" (2016) section. Athlon X4 835 and Athlon X4 845 is here. So we should choose: is they are APUs (and remove this remark about "No APU" from table) or not (and remove all Athlons from page) 109.172.98.69 (talk) 17:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 42 external links on List of AMD accelerated processing unit microprocessors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:06, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

L1 cache info missing

edit

Only Richland shows it. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 04:58, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Now it should only be missing for custom. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 18:58, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Cache detail

edit

I filled one example of each L1 configuration. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Did it for all desktop parts. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 05:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Server parts done. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 16:46, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Did it for embedded. Mobile was already done. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 21:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ultra-mobile done. 217.162.74.13 (talk) 23:56, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Double listing of Ryzen [3,5] 3[2,4]00[G,GE]

edit

I noticed that the “Raven Ridge Desktop” section also lists the 12nm SKUs that are marketed as “Picasso” and appear in that category as well. Is there a deeper reason behind this? Differences between RRidge and Picasso are arguably evolutionary only, but IMHO this doesn't justify duplication, and even less contradicting information (cf. TDP rating). --88.67.194.190 (talk) 12:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

FX-870K ?

edit

The FX-870K is currently not listed here, but can be found for sale on eBay at the moment. Images show the part number FD870KYBI44JC. This CPU is also known to a few websites, such as https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?id=2858 which indicates 2 modules, 4 cores, and 3.6/4.0GHz clock speeds. I believe it is a Godavari CPU, perhaps a sort of "FX-770K refresh", and perhaps only sold to OEMs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.72.245.173 (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

All links of the kind products.amd.com/en-us/search/ are now broken, redirecting to a useless front page. They should probably be removed outright and replaced with URLs of the format used in other sections (www.amd.com/en/products/ ) if available. Nemo 08:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ryzen 6000 series

edit

How come the Ryzen 6000 series of chips and updated 5000 series are not yet on this page?

Here's the list of new chips if someone wants to add them: [1]

Bofferbrauer (talk) 06:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:AMD Accelerated Processing Unit which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 07:01, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


Attack on article?

edit

Is this article under attack by malicious actors? I check back here every now and then and lately GFlops have disappeared from entries where they existed before and Raphael is listed as the most current desktop GPU (and has been removed and readded). Which is somewhat misleading. You cannot say that Raphael doesn't have a GPU. So technically it could be argued that it belongs here. However Raphael is *extremely* basic (it will either be paired with a graphics card or just be used to run the operating system and not much more). Nobody looking for a current APU will want to find Raphael. It is a mainstream processor with minimal graphics (cf. https://chipsandcheese.com/2023/01/05/amds-zen-4-part-3-system-level-stuff-and-igpu/ "Raphael’s integrated GPU does not have the performance ambitions of AMD’s APUs, and seems intended to drive a display when no dedicated GPU is available. It features AMD’s modern RDNA2 graphics architecture, but implements it in the smallest configuration possible with just one WGP."). --2A02:810B:4B3F:EA94:5420:C0C9:8F73:6FD2 (talk) 13:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dali Core

edit

Should split the Raven Ridge / Picasso dual cores to recognize the "Dali" die used on Athlon 3000G, and a few other dual-core parts... SVMLegacy (talk) 23:39, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Should iGPU clocks use MHz or GHz?

edit

Recent (last 2-3 gens) tables mostly use GHz for CPU and iGPU clock rates. But articles about GPUs use MHz in tables (f.e. Radeon RX 6000 series, GeForce 40 series, etc...).

Should iGPU clocks be in MHz or we continue using GHz and maybe adjust older tables (MHz > GHz)? Rando717 (talk) 19:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply