Talk:Linda Thelenius/Archive 1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Have put on an update of news on Linda. --Matrix17 17:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Surgery

edit

It is significant fact in her biography that she has chosen to have this surgery - and that she talks about it openly. Many women have had elective (plastic) surgery in general and the discussion around it - pro and con - is active. Wikipedia is a resource for anyone looking in to it. 62.64.210.111 18:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

As it is now the statement leaves a lot to ask for. The article would be much better off if it was expanded with a more in-depth section about her openness about the plastic surgery. Now the uninitiated reader get to know about it at the very end, without a proper background.
It should also be noted that her relationship with Fadde seems to be quite healthy and active (if you take a look in the referenced news article) as well as her music career as Bionda being disbanded for the moment.
With her changing nature it's difficult to keep up with how things are with her, especially since it's mostly tabloids who report her activities, and they're known to plant stories and make things up quite liberally. --Strangnet 18:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes you are totally right strangnet;). i think just like you it needs someone who can take the time to fill the story with some more info.--Matrix17 20:36, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Unencyclopedic content that I will delete on sight. --Servant Saber 17:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
It is entirely 'encyclopedic'. See article Breast implant. 'Unencyclopedic' is the last argument of the braindead. 62.64.141.28 09:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
With that argument it would be entirely encyclopedic to write if she owns a car. The article still needs expanding around that part (no pun intended), since her latest surgery is taken out of context. But I guess it's more important to argue over the small details instead of seeing the broader picture. --Strangnet 10:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Does she have a car? When she takes about her car ownership to the press, put it in. The point is that some people treat the surgery as if it exists only in some cartoon tabloid world entirely beneath an 'encyclopedia'. Treated in a straightforward way, the whole subject and the discussions around it are entirely encyclopedic 13:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC) --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.64.141.46 (talkcontribs)
Matrix17, buzz off. You've been kicked out of svWiki for good enough reasons, so quit spreading your crap here. Go and write an article about your own boobs and see what happens. Rosing's breasts are no more important than yours. --Servant Saber 13:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
I think you misunderstand the guidelines in WP:N. Owning or even driving a car isn't notable, and nowadays cosmetic surgery isn't either. It's notable what she does with it. If she happened to own a one of a kind car or if she's done something extraordinary with it it is notable, as well as her outspokenness with her multiple surgeries - why not add the latter instead of arguing about it? --Strangnet 15:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Servantsaber, this isnt a place for personal attacks. You might wont to tone down your personality alittle, do something constructive here instead.I think linda is famous for that and othe rthings ofcourse. then her plastic surgerys are wiki. But thats my opinion no need for so dramatic and unnecessary remarks from you servantsaber. Lets have a discussion instead.--Matrix17 16:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

No discussion. Boob sizes aren't encyclopedic content. --Servant Saber 17:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

No need for personal attacks and vandalism anyway servantsaber.!--Matrix17 17:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

This is getting boring. WP:NOT for anyone who wants to add boob talk to the article. --Servant Saber 18:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I want to referr to Carolina gynning, Lolo Ferrari, Pamela andersson, Anna Nicole Smith, Carmen Electra, Susan Ward and many more articles who mention breast implants and things around it. Maybe its trivial but its still in those articles so why should Linda get it? Else we have to delete the article parts on that from the other stories to i guess..Especially the article on Lolo Ferrari whos whole carrier was her big breasts.--Matrix17 19:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Author and Politician

edit

I erased the "author" and "politician" as part of her profession. I don't think having a journalist help her write a biography and starting an unregistered political party as the only candidate justifies this inclusion.Editfromwithout (talk) 01:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Linda Thelenius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply