Please expand

edit

If you know more about Lev L'Achim and have access to reliable sources, please expand on the beliefs section. As is, the article in stub form is heavy on controversy and too light on everything else. Please do not delete the controversial content, however, as that content is well referenced. --GoodDamon 16:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

About expanding:

Gladly, but they don't have any website I'm aware of. Basically the only source for a decent amount of information is their drives, otherwise it's mostly anti-religious sources. Also, shouldn't this be merged with Lev leAchim?98.109.213.143 (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Actually, Lev L'Achim is the correct spelling as far as I know, and that other article was created after this one. So it would be suitable to merge that one into this. --GoodDamon 02:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Added Work section with what information I could find. I'm still new at this, I don't know how to merge pages without messing them up.98.109.213.184 (talk) 22:25, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

List of Rabbis

edit

Do we need the four line list of Rabbis who have worked with them? WP is not the place for haskomos. If there is no objection I'd like to remove the list. If there are two or three that have done extensive work, they should be noted (and cited) as such. Joe407 (talk) 20:26, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I had meant to show how greatly accepted it is, but you're right. It should probbaly be amended to just stating it has much support from Rabbeim, and a few names connected with it. Which I would do, if I knew which names are closely connected. I can try to find out.173.54.15.241 (talk) 13:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lev L'Achim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)Reply