Talk:Leopold Koželuch

Untitled

Agh. I just finished Leopold Koželuh, didn't look for this article in the last day or so (when was this article written? Well, mine's mostly a translation of m:de:Leopold Koželuh anyway.) Propose merge?) Schissel | Sound the Note! 13:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Note: in favor of moving/merging it here would be the fact (bad grammar) that a number of pages link here. In favor of merging it there, the increasing predisposition toward using the "original" spelling (but the composer himself had it changed twice, once from Jan Antonín Koželuh to Leopold Koželuh, then to Kozeluch... suggesting as in many things that the last, not the middle, of his choices is the one to go by. I would agree that merging into and redirecting to this article would be the better choice. Of course, with proper sort keys too.. as is, it shows up under 1818 deaths e.g. under L...) Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Jan Antonín Koželuh

Is Jan Antonín Koželuh the same person? :-) --mj41 10:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

No. They were related, and Leopold was born with the same name- which he changed. Schissel | Sound the Note! 19:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

"The composer Jan Antonín Koželuh was his cousin and for awhile his teacher." Schissel | Sound the Note! 19:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Sources seem to differ whether they were cousins, uncle/nephew, ...? I may have to look into this after all. Schissel | Sound the Note! 21:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

No they were brothers 1.42.166.9 (talk) 11:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

We should probably include a link to this informative article to balance Smith's interpretation: http://www.annapetrova.com/en/2008/03/26/leopold-kozeluch/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.2.17.76 (talk) 15:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Work list

The detailed list of works is inappropriate and a little ridiculous to boot.--80.121.83.89 (talk) 10:59, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

In case anybody is tempted to remove the detailed list, please don't -- if it's not in Wikipedia, where on earth would one find it?David Couch (talk) 18:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

One should find the list in the literature. If it has not been published in print, it shouldn't be put into this article anyway. Simple rules, simple logic.--Suessmayr~enwiki (talk) 10:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

It currently has an air of original research. Where was this list sourced from? Karst (talk) 11:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)