Talk:Layoff/Archives/2017
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Check for POV
Article seems to be from a purely American viewpoint. What about other counties? UK? Wood Thrush (talk) 22:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Layoff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907014653/http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/wf_appd.htm to http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/wf_appd.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070109233051/http://www.armchairadvice.co.uk/leavingwork/rightsredundancy.asp to http://www.armchairadvice.co.uk/leavingwork/rightsredundancy.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080416222325/http://www.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2006/05/26/askthepilot187/ to http://www.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2006/05/26/askthepilot187/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Layoff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110610155850/http://blog.subpay.com:80/2011/05/17/what-are-supplemental-unemployment-benefits/ to http://blog.subpay.com/2011/05/17/what-are-supplemental-unemployment-benefits/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Peer Review
The edits that have been made to the Layoff’s page are very impressive and your group has done an excellent job improving the page. First off, I think that the introduction paragraph is very informative and allows for someone who knows nothing about the term, really get a feel for some of its basic terms. Then after you go into an actual terminology section which I think helps the reader better understand the ins and outs of what layoffs actually involve. I do also enjoy the explanation of the compensation system that goes hand and hand with layoffs, and the many links to other pages that can better define the term that way the page has a fluent flow of information without seeming to cluttered. Although I am confused on why you included just the compensation rate for Australia, I assume it is to give an example of differing kinds of compensation, but it does throw me off just a little. After that the sections of see also, references, and further readings is a great tool and the way you all have organized it is very clean looking and helpful. Altogether this edit has been both beneficial to the page, and anyone who is looking for more information on layoffs. I look forward to your groups presentation on your final edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonzales5064 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 27 November 2016 (UTC)