Talk:Laurel wilt

Would it be worthwhile to merge this page with the redbay ambrosia beetle, and have a redirect to link the two articles and species together? I understand that they are independent organisms, but their symbiosis appears obligate, and thus far the disease has not been observed without the presence of the vector. Aderksen (talk) 17:43, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Aderksen, I would agree. The beetle and pathogen are essentially obligate mutualists, and most of the same information regarding distribution, history, etc. apply to both. I work with laurel wilt and see that these pages need some updating, expanding, and referencing - it would be nice to not have to do that to two different pages. Unfortunately, I'm not yet savvy enough with wiki to merge them myself.Eickwort (talk) 17:22, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

• Hey: I'm just glad that someone else wants to tackle the revisions on this! I spent a lot less time on here after it became a lot less relevant to my job duties. Which research group are you working with on this? I have worked with Peña and Kendra's lab from time to time. Aderksen (talk) 12:37, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
• As an aside, there is a growing body of evidence that the beetle can go through development on other fungal sources, and some recent suggestions that other ambrosia beetles may be able to vector R. lauricola. Perhaps it is best if we leave the two pages separate until after ongoing experiments testing those hypotheses are published? Aderksen (talk) 17:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laurel wilt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111023042130/http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/foresthealth/laurelwilt/dist_map.shtml to http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/foresthealth/laurelwilt/dist_map.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laurel wilt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120911114333/http://www.freshfromflorida.com/press/2011/02252011.html to http://www.freshfromflorida.com/press/2011/02252011.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.pbcgov.com/coextension/mastergardener/pdf/redbayupdate.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)