| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
COI Contributions edit
Some of the information on this page has been contributed by the CSIRO Communications Team, and we welcome any discussion about the content. JennaDaroczy (talk) 09:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your contributions and for disclosing your COI.
- I don't think there's any way you could edit the page itself without violating WP:COI:
- This page in a nutshell: Do not edit Wikipedia in your own interests or in the interests of your external relationships.
- Your contributions should be limited to suggestions in TALK.
- You should also read WP:RS carefully. In particular, Wikipedia usually requires secondary sources, such as news stories from major independent news publications, rather than using the organization's own web site and releases. --Nbauman (talk) 16:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Clean up edit
After some clean up, and given the disclosure above, I have removed
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (February 2016) |
since the article now reads more neutral.Eastwood1964 (talk) 15:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
The first part of this article remains a hagiography. Can we have some reality injected, and a few decent references please? people.csiro.au is NOT a disinterested party! Ambiguosity (talk) 09:41, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Neutrality edit
The intro needs clean up given that part of it reads like a promotion. Other parts of the article now read like a newspaper editorial. Contributing editors should have no links, present or past, to CSIRO.Eastwood1964 (talk) 13:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Rewrite edit
I've done a minor rewrite of this page's content, as it was exceedingly hagiographic, promotional and editorialised as was mentioned by the above users. Still needs a lot of work, particularly the huge and largely irrelevant climate cutback section, as well as the laser section. If possible, a birthdate and photo should be added at some point, and some more neutral citations added. Thanks. Epsilonal (talk) 09:56, 8 August 2022 (UTC)