Talk:LOLI Database

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

LOLI Database

edit

This page is short, not useful, and is like an ad.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.62.235.254 (talkcontribs) 00:15, 14 October 2008

There are a few reasons why this article may be valuable: 1. The LOLI Database is a major source of information for people who work in the fields of Environemental Health and Safety, especially in authoring MSDSs. 2. The term LOLI is a commonly used name for lists of regualtory information 3. The use of LOLI in this case is significantly different from the other possible uses of LOLI.

Another suggestion might be to merge this information with either the company page, or with the chemical database page.Npeters22 (talk) 14:00, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LOLI Database. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply