Talk:Kray, miy ridniy kray

Improvements

I have noticed User:Jaan is interested in improving this article, your help would be most welcome.Rubikonchik (talk) 09:51, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

I am interested in removing this article which fails to meet the wp:n criteria. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 15:14, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Copyright violation?

(Moved from User talk:Petri Krohn#Kray, miy ridniy kray. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 10:25, 23 August 2010 (UTC))

Please explain, based on what have you registered a copyright violation here - [1] ? Rubikonchik (talk) 09:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

I did not not. It was user Jaan (talk · contribs). -- Petri Krohn (talk) 10:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Well what is violated exactly? Nothing is said in the applied tag.Rubikonchik (talk) 10:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

This is copyrighted text you are desperately reinserting here. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 11:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

The burden of proof lies on you, please provide a source for your assertion of any applicable copyright.Rubikonchik (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

From where did you get the lyrics? From out of thin air? In that case it would be WP:OR, or even worse, and needs to be removed. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 04:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Rubikonchik either has no clue on what copyright is or is openly ridiculing the community. I assume the former. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 08:10, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

No proof of copyrigt was given. User:Jaan has tagged the article with "copyright violation" but has never given any proof of copyright.Rubikonchik (talk) 08:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

You are swaying my vote towards the latter now. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 08:59, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Okay! Okay! We accept as prima facie evidence your assertion, that the lyrics are in the public domain. However, as you have not provided a reliable source for them, they must be removed as your own invention. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 10:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for providing the source for the lyrics: [2] This web site unfortunately does not meet the Wikipedia requirements of a reliable source. A proper reliable source would most likely also have a copyright statement. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 00:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

• It is not the burden of those who declare content a copyright infringement to prove it. Unless material is demonstrably public domain by age or point of origin, it is the burden of the person who imports the content to prove that it is compatibly licensed or that its copyright has been released. See Wikipedia's copyrights policy. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material or transcribed or translated from recorded materials; such additions will be deleted. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)