Talk:Kostyonki–Borshchyovo

(Redirected from Talk:Kostyonki-Borshchyovo archaeological complex)
Latest comment: 3 months ago by 2601:444:300:B070:8143:ED8D:89BB:F5BF in topic Suggested Edit ... Kostenki is a Map to North America

Coordinate error edit

The coordinates need the following fixes:

  • Write here

194.208.116.38 (talk) 10:39, 31 January 2010 (UTC)the correct coordinates are: 51.405645°, 39.042797°194.208.116.38 (talk) 10:39, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wasn't really in need of fixing, but adjusted nonetheless. Mephistophelian (talk) 21:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Kostenki or Kostyonki? edit

Does it matter, generally, which spelling is used for the discussion?

Relative to the human remains, paleontologists consistently refer to it as "Kostenki".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8435317.stm
http://johnhawks.net/taxonomy/term/342

Type in "Kostyonki" and Google gives no paleontological results, but asks "Did you mean: Kostenki?" I think that it's clear what needs to be done. Kortoso (talk) 18:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

See yo (Cyrillic). And the article is not about paleontological results; it's about a rural locality (in the names of which "ё" is consistently romanized as "yo"). Paleontological information has simply been upmerged into this article as it was the closest available target. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); November 22, 2013; 18:40 (UTC)
So then, the paleontologists have been pronouncing it wrong. At least they got their re-direct. Hopefully they will learn how to pronounce it correctly. Kortoso (talk) 20:57, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
But it's not about "right" or "wrong" at all. Both variants are perfectly acceptable; the (sometimes arbitrary) choice of one over another is regulated only by the guidelines. And this is a transliteration, not a transcription. For pronunciation guidance, one needs to look at the transcription, not transliteration. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); November 22, 2013; 21:28 (UTC)
This article is in English, so the variations in transliteration and Russian/Ukrainian pronunciation are irrelevant. Please refer to the paleontology cites that I have offered. This article is about the ancient find, not the locality, which I believe has its own entry. Here are more examples of this archeological find as cited in professional literature:
Kostenki 14 – A 36,000 Year Old European[1]
The man from Kostenki shared close ancestry with hunter-gatherers in Europe—as well as with the early farmers, suggesting that his ancestors interbred with members of the same Middle Eastern population who later turned into farmers and came to Europe themselves.[2]
Genome of Kostenki-14, an Upper Paleolithic European (Seguin-Orlando, Korneliussen, Sikora, et al. 2014)[3]

Kortoso (talk) 22:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I can see that nobody has said anything on this topic for a few years. I think that the page absolutely does need to be renamed to "Kostenki-Borshchevo archaeological complex" or something similar - maybe just "Kostenki-Borshchevo" with a disambiguation page to separate the pages for the archaeological complex from pages for the villages themselves. In English, the area is, to my knowledge, never referred to as Kostyonki-Borschyovo - the only place I recall ever seeing this is on Google Maps. There are numerous ways of transliterating "ë" - it can be e, ë, yo - but in this case it is clear that in normal usage, the area is referred to as "Kostenki-Borshchevo". If nobody has any objections, I would like to move the page. Alopex720 (talk) 09:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

References

Dating edit

The eruption of the Phlegraean Fields volcano occurred about 39.28 ± 0.11 ka.

Come on now. We can get away with "about 39,000 years ago" can't we?

Kortoso (talk) 18:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I believe the wording is the way it is because the person who added this information copied the format directly from the source. But since we are simply summarizing the source (and are doing it for laymen readers), using "about 39,000 years ago" instead would be perfectly reasonable. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 30, 2014; 19:03 (UTC)
Righto. Thanks. I'm on it. Kortoso (talk) 19:11, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
The para is still logical nonsense, because self-contradicting and not coordinated with the special wiki articels.2A02:8108:9640:1A68:A43A:2A66:7E5A:BC61 (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Source? edit

Possibly copy & paste from World Heritage Encyclopedia (or vice versa?):

http://www.gutenberg.us/article/whebn0008887281/kostyonki,%20voronezh%20oblast
Search for "assemlage".

Cultures edit

No answer re: Strelec and Sheletian cultures? In the original document these are Strelets and Szeletian.

Strelets: Upper Palaeolithic culture of the Oka-Don Lowland of European Russia, dated to c 40,000-25,000 bp. The earliest assemblages include Middle Palaeolithic scrapers, points, and bifaces. Later assemblages have scrapers, burins, non-stone tools, and art objects. The diagnostic tool is a small triangular bifacial point with concave base.[1]
Szeletian: Early Upper Palaeolithic industry of central Europe with bifacial foliated points and sidescrapers, but it has also been applied to the industries with foliated points which mark the transition from the Middle Paleolithic to Upper Paleolithic periods throughout the eastern part of central Europe. It appears to have developed from the Middle Palaeolithic (Micoquian). The type site is Szeleta Cave in the Bükk Mountains in Hungary. The culture seems to date between 45,000-25,000 BC, the middle of the Last Glacial. Later assemblages contain endscrapers and retouched blades.[2]

Kortoso (talk) 21:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kostyonki (palaeolithic site). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kostyonki (palaeolithic site). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Deleted edit

"In the period around 40-24 kya, a latitudinal[dubious ] clinal pattern of modern/Neanderthal traits was indicated in Europe. The Kostyonki sites are located at the more modern eastward end.[citation needed]" - Having gotten no corrections of this confused nonsence after two years I deleted it.HJJHolm (talk) 15:33, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Suggested Edit ... Kostenki is a Map to North America edit

Suggested Edit ... Kostenki is a Map to North America

See ... Great Circle Navigation Archaeology

Example 2

Kostenki 11 Mammoth Bone Circle Russia

Quoin Island Persian Gulf, Kostenki 11, Last Ice Age Driftless Area La Crosse Wisconsin

https://goo.gl/maps/MA2DtHCLD1DTsDz2A … map

https://drive.google.com/file/d/18y24RAtbRH91_wtyzQXCPXWCafLnNjJC/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ONaBFhOcL4zAPQICatN6fe87kKWdJ1sw/view?usp=sharing

[1]

2601:444:300:B070:8143:ED8D:89BB:F5BF (talk) 01:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply