Talk:Kormesiy

Latest comment: 8 years ago by 212.5.158.189 in topic Title - Княз

Title - Княз edit

Many of the earlier Bulgarian Rulers were clearly mentioned as "Kings" (Князе) , no "khan" (never) or "han" - never!

Here is one research about that: [1]

--176.12.58.89 (talk) 20:52, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

This (unpublished?) article contradicts the established nomenclature in Bulgarian and international historiography. It is a WP:FRINGE theory and as such it has no place in these Wikipedia articles. You have already been warned about this, so kindly please stop using different IPs to push your personal point of view. Toдor Boжinov 05:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • There are many other quite qualified studies for the subject, as those xmpls:

http://history.rodenkrai.com/new/bylgarski_ezik/han_kan_ili_knqz.html

http://www.spisanie8.bg/%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%BD/%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5/170-%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-8-%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B9-62015-%D0%B3.html

and more. --212.5.158.189 (talk) 22:47, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ http://www.protobulgarians.com/Statii%20ot%20drugi%20avtori/K%20Gerbov%20-%20KANAS%20-%20KNYAZ.pdf „Канасубиги” е „княз”, а не „хан ” или „кан”