This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Title - Княз edit
Many of the earlier Bulgarian Rulers were clearly mentioned as "Kings" (Князе) , no "khan" (never) or "han" - never!
Here is one research about that: [1]
--176.12.58.89 (talk) 20:52, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- This (unpublished?) article contradicts the established nomenclature in Bulgarian and international historiography. It is a WP:FRINGE theory and as such it has no place in these Wikipedia articles. You have already been warned about this, so kindly please stop using different IPs to push your personal point of view. — Toдor Boжinov — 05:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- There are many other quite qualified studies for the subject, as those xmpls:
http://history.rodenkrai.com/new/bylgarski_ezik/han_kan_ili_knqz.html
and more. --212.5.158.189 (talk) 22:47, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
References
- ^ http://www.protobulgarians.com/Statii%20ot%20drugi%20avtori/K%20Gerbov%20-%20KANAS%20-%20KNYAZ.pdf „Канасубиги” е „княз”, а не „хан ” или „кан”