Talk:Kinsale cloak

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 January 2017 by reviewer Icebob99 (talk · contribs).

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Objective V Subjective edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

While the article is otherwise largely grand, in a few places there are examples of inherently subjective terms - like "graceful" or "well made". While only a few examples now remain, where we use these terms (per WP:NPOV and WP:WikiVoice in particular), we should ensure that such terms are not "stated in Wikipedia's voice [..but instead..] they should be attributed in the text to particular sources". So, if someone described the cloaks as "graceful" for example, it should be clear whose opinion this was, and it should be very clear that it is a quote. For example, "person Y describes the cloaks as 'Q'". If we can't attribute opinions or subjective terms like this, we should just avoid using them. Guliolopez (talk) 23:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

This is now largely addressed. Closing thread. Guliolopez (talk) 10:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Can we please keep the bit about Spenser as a 'minion' of Elizabeth I? If not, homocidal ****** ******* would do fine. Fergananim (talk) 17:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Fergananim: minion is an amusing term but doesn't sound terribly encyclopedic (WP:NPOV comes into play unless we provide a reference specifically stating that he was a minion). Spenser is recognized the most for his poetry contributions and not for his deeds in the name of Elizabeth. I'm editing the article with this wording. Please let me know if you have any thoughts. Icebob99 (talk) 22:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic