Talk:Kings Contrivance, Columbia, Maryland

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

It's "Kings" without the apostrophe edit

According to all official sources. I'll try to correct it if no one objects; requires renaming the page... 63.239.69.1 19:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I did this. --GregU 23:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kings Contrivance, Columbia, Maryland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Kings Contrivance, Columbia, Maryland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply