Talk:Kimmy Robertson
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Fair use rationale for Image:Kimmyrobertson.jpg edit
Image:Kimmyrobertson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Brian Peck letter edit
Should we discuss the fact that she wrote a letter of support to Brian Peck here? 2600:100C:A20E:2:E039:B781:5D41:E35E (talk) 02:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- My edit was just removed as “libel” it’s not libel if they are factual statements backed by court documents and real words written by that individual and submitted to a court of law. Wikipedia is meant to encourage growth and knowledge not hide facts about people or pages because they are deemed ugly. Do better. Toddbo (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's already in the article. All you did was add a bunch of unreliable sources, such as the unreliable Daily Mail, which is why I originally labeled my revert as libel. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)