Talk:Khazar Lankaran FK

Comments regarding article

Neutrality in dispute on the team having the best players, stadium, fans, etc. Discrepancy in spelling of team name, from article title to article contents and cited website (which offers a poor English auto-translation). Article mentions team being successful despite being just 3 years old, yet says team was founded in 1975. More work is needed. Gitusum 10:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

The club's website claims the club was founded in 2004, so I think we should go with that. It does also claim that the club is "one of strongest and most pretentious teams". Ho, ho. Dancarney 09:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Khazar Lenkoran.png

Image:Khazar Lenkoran.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

File:Lankxazar.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Lankxazar.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Khazar Lankaran FK/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cloudz679 (talk · contribs) 14:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

I will do the review for this article. C679 14:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Not close to meeting the GA criteria at the moment. The prose is basically a regurgitation of the (rather short) list of honours this club has won in its ten year existence, with a couple of manager changes thrown in. Consider the use of the infobox stadium, which is about 3 times as long as the prose connected with the topic. Is that relevant to the club article or is a text summary sufficient?

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   Frequent errors in grammar and use of English, resulting in difficulty reading almost every sentence, e.g. 1) "After Mircea Rednic's appointment, who have signed a string of Romanian players and footballers from Liga I, club did not found success in European cups" and 2) "There is often a fierce rivalry between the two strongest teams in the Azerbaijan Premier League, and this is particularly the case in Azerbaijan", etc.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Illogical subsections, e.g. "Rise and fall" and "recent years", which don't make sense to the article. Some lists have unintelligible headings, e.g. in "UEFA club competition record" and "League and domestic cup history".

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   Some of the external links do not appear to be relevant websites as set out in the Good Article criteria.

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   article lacks inline citations, particularly relating to statistics. Checklinks shows eight broken links.

   C. No original research:

   There is unattributed material in the article.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Headings generally show some promise but the scope is not met due to such an acute lack of information. Some of the most clear omissions is where they played before 2006, how their "strong financial position" impacted on their cause, etc.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   "Khazar is one of the best supported clubs in Azerbaijan, having the highest attendance in the Caucasus region. Supporters of Khazar Lankaran are drawn from all over the Southern Region and beyond, with supporters' clubs all across the world." this is a heavily biased statement, supported by a (dead) primary source. The lead contains misleading information apparently to impart additional notability on this club, e.g. "The club is also a member of the European Club Association, an organization that replaced the previous G-14 which consists of major football clubs in Europe."

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Many issues to work out before this can pass GA. After considering the issues raised here, Wikipedia:Peer review may be a good place to go next. C679 15:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khazar Lankaran FK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131126081515/http://lankaranfc.com/az/2009-09-01_105/actual-news/con-toshak-istefa-verdi.html to http://lankaranfc.com/az/2009-09-01_105/actual-news/con-toshak-istefa-verdi.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Khazar Lankaran FK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090913034052/http://www.moldfootball.com/eurocups/2005-2006/present_xazar.php to http://www.moldfootball.com/eurocups/2005-2006/present_xazar.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140101094323/http://firtina.az/ to http://www.firtina.az/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924041006/http://www.musavat.com/site/shownews.php?news_id=41611&arxiv=yes to http://www.musavat.com/site/shownews.php?news_id=41611&arxiv=yes
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090911064649/http://pfl.az/content.php?lang=az&page=14&nid=110 to http://pfl.az/content.php?lang=az&page=14&nid=110

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Khazar Lankaran FK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080131204156/http://news.bakililar.az/news_lyankaranskiy_xazar_vyiqra_12222.html to http://www.news.bakililar.az/news_lyankaranskiy_xazar_vyiqra_12222.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.onlinesport.ro/stiri/fotbal/fotbal-intern/stranieri/77297/azerii-au-dat-afara-toti-strainii-rednic-pe-faras.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706130735/http://xl.fanat.az/news_181.html to http://xl.fanat.az/news_181.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090705104738/http://www.football-plus.az/view_post.php?id=904 to http://www.football-plus.az/view_post.php?id=904
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706130748/http://www.lankaranfc.az/en/news/?news_id=19 to http://www.lankaranfc.az/en/news/?news_id=19

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)