Talk:Khalid Mohammed Salih Al Dhuby
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
explanation
editI reverted this edit. Legal scholars at Seton Hall University prepared a dozen detailed, methodical studies of the documents the DoD had published about the captives. In those studies they analyzed the extent captives were characterized as "Taliban fighters", "Taliban members", or "associated with the Taliban". They treated this distinction as significant. I believe we should treat this distinction as significant. Geo Swan (talk) 00:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- There has never been an article "associated with the Taliban". It is a simply redirect to "Taliban". So i think it could be misleading in it's current form. You have a link to this study? I would like to have a look at it to clarify this. Iqinn (talk) 01:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- User:Iqinn was eventually indefinitely blocked for tendetious editing, edit-warring, and sockpuppetry. Geo Swan (talk) 23:34, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
rough work
editThese links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors. Geo Swan (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
CSRT allegations | 33 |
ARB 1 allegations | 66-68 |
ARB 2 allegations | 88-90 |
ARB 3 allegations | 36-39 |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Khalid Mohammed Salih Al Dhuby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930184542/http://cageprisoners.com/articles.php?aid=3838 to http://cageprisoners.com/articles.php?aid=3838
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1773140.stm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2008/12/16%20detainees%20wittes/1216_detainees_wittes.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)