Talk:Keven Stammen

Notability

This article fails to establish notability and sets a bad precedent for publishing indiscriminate information pertaining to marginally successful poker players. Further, the sources do not verify the notability of this article nor do they provide adequate coverage required by WP:NOTE. The article should be merged or deleted. John Kronenwetter (talk) 16:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

The Poker WikiProject considers a subject to be notable if they win a WSOP event, which this player here. Now, obviously they don't have final say - Wikipedia's notability guidelines do and they say someone is notable if they have had significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. this player also passes that guideline, as evidenced by the sourcing provided by Plastikspork. I wouldn't have de-PRODed the article if such coverage didn't exist - Plastikspork simply added it before I had a chance to. Finally, he isn't a marginally successful player as his career earning are $1.7M and even if he was it would establish a precedent for anything since "Other stuff exists" is never a valid reason to keep an article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Keven Stammen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090601234003/http://officialpokerrankings.com/pokerstars/Stammdogg/poker/results/3756B057A73E4CB0B1046DC6BB449624.html?t=2 to http://www.officialpokerrankings.com/pokerstars/Stammdogg/poker/results/3756B057A73E4CB0B1046DC6BB449624.html?t=2
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090701050844/http://www.pahrumpvalleytimes.com/2009/Jun-26-Fri-2009/sports/29628325.html to http://www.pahrumpvalleytimes.com/2009/Jun-26-Fri-2009/sports/29628325.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 4 May 2017 (UTC)