Talk:Ken Evoy

Untitled

http://graphics.sitesell.com/other_graphics/toys_globe_article_supp.jpg

http://graphics.sitesell.com/other_graphics/toys_gazette_article_supp.gif

In addition to a more recent set of interviews on CJAD 800 AM's Peter Anthony Holder Show (Holder Overnight)...

http://www.cjad.com/

...this makes the SiteSell article both "verifiable" and "neutral" based on the Notability criteria...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability

This page has already been deleted and its history removed. I contest, based on the above (which covers both this article on the person as well as the person's company - Sitesell) that it be readded.Maltiti 01:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

I can't comment on whether or not this page should have been deleted, but this is not the correct way to go about restoring it. I would contact and admin, such as User:The Epopt, and ask them to restore the page to your subpage, and ask them to take a look and tell you what was wrong with it, if anything. Thedreamdied 01:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

From SiteSell Corporate

Please see...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ronz#Regarding_SiteSell_Corporate_username

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Akradecki#Regarding_Ken_Evoy

We seem to have caused a great deal of consternation by intuitively registering as SiteSell_Corporate, openly revealing potential COI. If you review the history of that edit, you will see it was objective, early years' material. We didn't know it was necessary to "register" and it seemed to us that if someone wanted to be clandestine, he would do so. And if not, why not just register with an openly obvious username? Sorry for violating the rules, there are just so many of them.

Subsequent edits (after ours, up to today) have made the article better, and we will leave you with our suggestions in the above two URLs. The article was sent to Ken Evoy, who has confirmed it is accurate, with the recommendations made in our talk at the above two URLs.

But from now on, he suggested that we should stay out it. We have never posted to "Ken Evoy" before, only one edit was made (an objective one). So can you please remove the COI designation?

Thanks very much SiteSell Corporate 17:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ken Evoy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071214074638/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=a77d249d-0ae4-491b-827e-cb478d976bae&k=52575 to http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=a77d249d-0ae4-491b-827e-cb478d976bae&k=52575

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)