Talk:Kaun Banega Crorepati

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 157.32.44.52 in topic Timelining-format for infobox

Timelining-format for infobox

edit

Hello there, To keep this very, very, very brief in spite of my 'proclivities': I made quite a few changes to this article, including but not limited to the extremely-unconventional way of referring to season #s corresponding to respective parameters in the infobox without making it clear as such, perhaps based on the assumption that it would be a "common sense" interpretation for everybody to infer those numerals as only-and-only referring to seasons, but given the rarity of such a practice here on English-language Wikipedia, I 'fixed' it to denote that each of those numerals in parenthesis are actually referring to seasons # only. However.. Now they don't look [cosmetically] appealing as they take 'too much' of space.

So..

I think that ought to be improved, as well. So in the spirit of collaboration for improvement, what should be done to those values. I've 2 either/or resolutions: A) Make the fonts of each-and-every single one smaller. (As I originally did to SPTV's note in the " B) Replace the seasonal descriptor with far more commonplace one on WP:TV articles [including on WWTBAM/WP:TVGS ones], the year one. So for instance, instead of "(seasons 1–2)", it would read ‘(2000–2002)’.

What thoughts on this?


P.S. Speaking of "common sense" vs readability, please remove that clumsily added, unsigned text disclosing somebody's contact # and as I see it, there's also a whole section dedicated to doxxing cell numbers on this very talk-page from majorly Pākistān-based IP addresses [one of whom is blocked for 3 years]. Researching on Truecaller's db reveals all save for one appear to be personal contact #s, that one is seemingly belonging to alleged scammers from Merica. Not just these acts of vandalism which stringently violate WP:NOT#FORUM be reverted, but the records of their addition and deletion must be struck-off so that the privacy of those who might not have even heard of Wikipedia could be violated by visiting of this page by unscrupulous miners. —103.163.124.72 (talk) 07:12, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sha 157.32.44.52 (talk) 16:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply