Talk:Kathleen O'Kelly-Kennedy/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Hawkeye7 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:30, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Comments

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

GAN criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Above comments cover the issues I've noted.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comment on hold until the above issues are resolved. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nearly there, just that one pending issue on the amputation. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:32, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply