Talk:Karub, Qamdo

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Karub, Qamdo article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tibet Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New proposal for Tibetan naming conventions edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I recently proposed a new set of Tibetan naming conventions which could end up affecting the title of this article. Please see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Tibetan) and Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Tibetan)#New naming convention proposal. Your comments and feedback are requested.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 23:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lhasa which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:44, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Census table edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The population in the table must be wrong - not only is it too low to support a mining town, but one has a population of 0, one of 2.5 and another of -6 5.173.233.45 (talk) 08:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

This seems to be because of the Revision as of 15:44, 8 May 2021, this page has a history of vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.173.233.45 (talk)

Add topic