Talk:Kaliya

Untitled

This is part of the Indian Mythology.

Removed wikify tag and added merge tag. this doesn't equal an article of it's own unless it can be expanded upon. if not merge it with Krishna. 66.82.9.73 20:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 03:40, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

---

Kāliyā → Kaliya — Common English spellings like Shiva, Ganesha (FA article), Krishna are used in the title, not the IAST Śiva or Ganeśa, which though academic, are known to small group of scholars and readers of books written by scholars. The majority of common Indians will not recognize Śiva, they will recognize Shiva as newspapers, magazines use the common English spelling. The article uses non-IAST/Indian English spellings like Krishna, Garuda, Vrindavan. So for consistency, I suggest we move to the common English (Indian English) spelling Kaliya, instead of the IAST. See also Talk:Mahabharata#Move_back for similar proposal. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:24, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose. Unlike Śiva, Kṛṣṇa and Ganeśa, Kāliyā is spelt with the same letters with or without the diacritics. Anyone uncomfortable at the usage of macrons can "read through" them as they do with Mötley Crüe or Tone Lōc. — AjaxSmack 23:23, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Mahābhārata and Kāli can also be read through, still they are now at the article names Mahabharata and Kali. Comparing this with Mötley Crüe or Tone Lōc is erroneous as diacritics are part of the original proper name in both of them; while Kāliyā is an IAST, Kaliya the common Indian English spelling. This article uses Krishna (common Indian English spelling), not the IAST Kṛṣṇa (similarly for Garuda, Vrindavan, Kadamba, Mahabharata etc. IAST is not used) but only for Kāliyā and Nāga(now changed), it is IAST. That is like swinging between American English and British English spellings in the same article.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

• Agree with the page move to Kaliya, per request. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 16:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

• Support. I'm generally in favour of IAST, especially in cases where ignoring diacritics gives the same spelling as that of the loose transliteration. But this seems a common enough name, and is not even mostly related to Sanskrit literature for which inaccurate transcription would be confusing, so the simpler name is fine. Shreevatsa (talk) 16:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

• Support per nom. --CarTick (talk) 16:50, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

• Support, unless there's a clear argument to be made that "Kaliya" will confuse the term with other standard-Latin renderings of Indian terms. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaliya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121112235722/http://srimadbhagavatam.com/10/16/en to http://srimadbhagavatam.com/10/16/en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Kaliya

Which Bhagavata Purana is this? KakashiHatakehereforu (talk) 12:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)