Talk:Kaiserchronik

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This article seems to give a number of judgements in a number of places without reference; do these come from third-party analyses of the subject work of the article, or were they the article author's opinion? It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 23:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

They were taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia. I have now removed these judgements, as they do not in any case reflect a modern consensus. --Doric Loon (talk) 08:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

OK, but N.B. the "best edition" comment is still unsourced as far as I can tell – only the source itself is given, not some review of it. It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 14:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good point. But actually, it's the ONLY critical edition, so we don't need the word "best", which removes the need to source something subjective. --Doric Loon (talk) 10:30, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic