Talk:Junkers EF 132
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Junkers EF 132 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
3 or 6 cannons?
editThe text says three twin cannon installations (a "turret", BTW, is a rotating housing holding guns; tail guns are almost never in turrets. It is not a synonym for flexible aircraft gun position, in spite of people using it widely to mean that). This would mean 6 cannon total. The specifications say "3 cannon in dorsal, ventral, and tail [installations]". Which is it? It is early enough to be one, and late enough to be the other. Single cannon were typical in WWII, but twin guns became the norm after the war. The B-36 had twin 20mm cannon installations, but it was a large aircraft. I can think of some others. Maybe it depended on which period the design was in, since it sounds like they puttered around with it for some years, and probably it saw a number of alterations.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:38, 24 July 2020 (UTC)