Talk:Julianstown

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Baldy Bill in topic Inbound merge

I don't think that references to a bypass around the town, 'increasing'(?) traffic volumes, traffic lights and a shop that closed in 1995 should be included the opening section.

layout change

edit

Moved the section on Traffic further down in the Article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.31.24.2 (talk) 07:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Julianstown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Inbound merge

edit

...because the article on the census town has very limited content, the subject of population can be adequately covered in a paragraph here. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 01:35, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply