Talk:Joss Bland-Hawthorn
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it's in the process of being created. Prof. Joss Bland-Hawthorn will start adding the required information as soon as possible (in the next couple of hours). I have aided him at setting up his page and will assist him with editing, if necessary. PLEASE do not delete this page. Thank you!
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I'm adding information to the page as we 'speak'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ttepperg (talk • contribs) 06:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because all information is correct and appropriate links are provided. I am one of Australia's senior scientists. many thanks, Joss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:3096:1200:D98D:FADD:8CD1:1CFC (talk) 07:24, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Professor Bland-Hawthorn and Ttepperg -- Thanks for responding. I have declined the immediate request for deletion. However, you should note that creating autobiographies, or biographies of people that you know, is not recommended. You should read the guidelines at WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Autobiography, and carefully follow the instructions there, before editing the article further.
- Looking at the Google Scholar profile, I believe that the subject would be likely to meet the inclusion threshold for an academic; see Wikipedia:Notability (academics) for details of how to demonstrate notability for an academic. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 07:45, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Re: Article Issues
editHi,
It has been pointed out that this article has some issues. However, I find that the article follows the same style as other, similar articles, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Binney
Could you please be more specific about what in this article is not conforming with there required style in comparison with the above article so it can be improved?
Many thanks in advance for your reply.
Kind regards