This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
RfC - "Accused sex offender" -> "charged with child pornography offences"
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
wp:BLPCRIME states editors must seriously consider not including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed, or is accused of having committed, a crime, unless a conviction has been secured. As Duggar is a notable individual, but has not yet been definitively convicted, it seems appropriate that the precise nature of the charges are made directly in the lede. The vague "accused sex offender" terminology whilst succinct, does not appropriately balance the importance of A living person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until convicted by a court of law, whilst at the same time, including wp:DUE weight on the extremely notable and thoroughly covered allegations criminal activity.69.172.145.94 (talk) 17:04, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
