Talk:Josh Duggar/Archive 3
Latest comment: 2 years ago by LeoFrank in topic Accused sex offender and BLPCRIME
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Accused sex offender and BLPCRIME
 | This edit request to Josh Duggar has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
More of a question as opposed to a direct request but:
- Is "accused sex offender" the correct terminology to use in the lede, considering wp:BLPCRIME, especially in the light of
editors must seriously consider not including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed, or is accused of having committed, a crime, unless a conviction has been secured
? Notwithstanding the fact that Duggar may be a public figure, for crimes of this nature, is it more appropriate to be very specific on the nature of the accusations to avoid accusations of tabloid-ish writing?
Edit request: Change from "accused sex offender" to "charged with child pornography offenses" in order to address BLPCRIME issues and wikivoice issues. 69.172.145.94 (talk) 09:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}}template. — LeoFrank Talk 10:00, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
