Talk:Joseph Swetnam

First complete English fencing treatise?

This line is misleading. The explanation in the "Fencing Manual" section is argumentative and unsourced. If this problem isn't addressed, I'll have to take care of it... but I'm not sure how best to do that except to delete the offending sections. Sebatinsky (talk) 02:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Bias

The "misogynist" section of this article is about the least neutral Wikipedia entry I've ever seen. 173.70.36.208 (talk) 23:31, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Swetnam probably thought that he was merely upholding eternal verities under threat, but a number of other people -- both at the time and afterwards -- thought that he displayed a level of misogyny bordering on the pathological. In those days, you could claim that males were the superior sex, say that women should defer to their husbands, and should be silent in church and not overly talkative elsewhere, and pull up a few Bible verses and well-worn quotes from Aristotle and the church fathers on the subject, and you would not be considered particularly controversial. Therefore the fact that Swetnam was controversial is significant... AnonMoos (talk) 08:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joseph Swetnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924015545/http://www.uoregon.edu/~dluebke/WesternCiv102/SwetnamArraignment1615.htm to http://www.uoregon.edu/~dluebke/WesternCiv102/SwetnamArraignment1615.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717125340/http://tysonwright.com/sword/SwetnamSchooleOfDefence.pdf to http://tysonwright.com/sword/SwetnamSchooleOfDefence.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)