Talk:Joseph Joestar

Untitled

I have removed the speedy delete tag, as I don't see how this is a non-notable bio. If you don't feel this character is major enough to warrant his own page, I would reccommend you suggest a merge to the main article instead. If there is already enough there on him and you still don't feel this page is neccisary, an AfD is probably the way to go. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 17:38, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Tarot-hermit.jpg

The image Image:Tarot-hermit.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

File:JoeJo.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:JoeJo.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

"OH MY GOD!" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect OH MY GOD!. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 2#OH MY GOD! until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 16:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

"Abilities" section

The abilities section that's been added in recently reeks of Fancruft so how are we going to make it less messy? 2603:7000:1F00:6B91:140E:37B3:D961:20E2 (talk) 21:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Combining them with appearances section seems the quickest way. The whole Ripple thing can be explained in the part 2 summary while his Stand can be explained in Part 3.Tintor2 (talk) 21:59, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Excellent. I'll put the ability info in the summaries and you can proofread. 2603:7000:1F00:6B91:24C3:D52D:385E:F461 (talk) 23:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Same user as above. Unfortunately the appearances section functions as Joseph's biography, I can't exactly Include his powers and abilities there. So either leave it as is or remove it entirely. I'm also noticing a similar "Abilities" section on the Dio Brando and Jotaro Kujo pages. [[Special:Contributions/2603:7000:1F00:6B91:24C3:D52D:385E

F461|2603:7000:1F00:6B91:24C3:D52D:385E:F461]] (talk) 23:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Avoid the argument other stuff unless such articles happen to be into the Good format or Featured format. These are the articles that should be used as examples to follow. They don't focus on in-universe information and try to balance both real world information with in-universe information.Tintor2 (talk) 00:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

I meant to mention those pages to say that they may also need to be removed or altered, not as an example to keep this page's ability section. 2603:7000:1F00:6B91:24C3:D52D:385E:F461 (talk) 01:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your next line is...

Joseph is the best JoJo! 138.219.115.221 (talk) 01:02, 7 December 2021 (UTC)