Talk:Jorge Pacheco Areco

State of siege

This article never mentions that Pacheco used the guerillas as justification to impose a state of siege which he then misused. He repeatedly violated the spirit and letter of the constitution. There is also no mention of Pacheco as a polarizing figure in Uruguayan politics. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dri3s (talk • contribs) 16:24, April 27, 2006.

I've expanded the article somewhat; feel free to add more information, so long as you cite references. Note that the {{NPOV}} template is meant to signify a content dispute, not to request that the article be expanded. // [admin] Pathoschild (^talk/_map) 22:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Well yes, I realize that, but I feel that these things are so obvious that not mentioning them is a NPOV violation. --Dri3s 17:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Beware, article is politically biased

This article is politically biased and not well referenced. There were many reasons for the labor strikes in Uruguay in the early sixties; they were internally generated, not by Soviet influences. Rather, Pacheco used the fear of Soviet influences to justify the State of Emergency and repressive measures. The citation given is an article by a politician (Sanguinetti), not scholarly or unbiased. I cannot fix this myself, but someone needs to go through and correct it using proper historic materials, e.g. "Historiai Contemporanea del uruguay" by Gerardo Caetano and Jose Rilla. The Spanish page is slightly better. Laurids2 (talk) 16:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jorge Pacheco Areco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060420070419/http://www.terra.es/personal2/monolith/uruguay.htm to http://www.terra.es/personal2/monolith/uruguay.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jorge Pacheco Areco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130605174720/http://www.espectador.com/text/pacheco.htm to http://www.espectador.com/text/pacheco.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC)