Talk:John Wick (game designer)

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Role-playing games High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I can see in the history that the link to the vlog http://www.youtube.com/user/LordStrange has been added and taken away several times. I have followed the link and confirmed that it is indeed genuine and added it again. This is not a spam link, it is about the subject of the article. Please do not remove it again and instead discuss the issue here. d<3vid seaward | Talk 21:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I am the one who's added this link several times. I'm a friend of John's and this is definitely his You Tube account and page. He identifies himself in virtually every video link and he talks and adds on to his famous Play Dirty series. Is it possible to revert back to the edits I added? I'm not up on the wiki-fu.

Also, this is a link to a current picture of John Wick via his Facebook page: http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash1/hs499.ash1/27225_1393210428942_1192599148_1133784_253124_n.jpg Is it possible to post it here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.40.238.163 (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

"John Wick Dead at 33" Hoax edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

One theory about this hoax is that it was Wick himself who made the announcement, in order to see what people would say about him. 12.45.255.66 (talk) 19:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Does a online rumor that lasts for a few hours really constitute a hoax? That's more like internet trolling, and Wikipedia should not be in the habit of recording every incident of trolling with no historical impact or significance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.164.228.213 (talk) 17:51, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I agree, this incident doesn't seem particularly noteworthy, and have removed it from the article. Robofish (talk) 11:46, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

John Wick at Pyramid Magazine edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wick wrote a column on gaming for the online magazine Pyramid for several months. It was controversial with the readership. His "resignation letter" took the form of an abbreviated column. I.e., the editor was expecting a normal column of the usual length, and instead unexpectedly received a much-shorter piece of no particular gaming utility. This was also a source of controversy, as it was markedly unprofessional to surprise the editor like that. 12.45.255.66 (talk) 19:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic