Talk:John Molo

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
edit

The External links section should be limited to a very short list of websites that are highly related to the article's subject. For a musician this would generally include the official web site(s) for the musician or their band, and not much else. Per Wikipedia:External links#References and citation, "Sites that have been used as sources in the creation of an article should be cited in the article, and linked as references, either in-line or in a references section. Links to these source sites are not 'external links' for the purposes of this guideline, and should not normally be duplicated in an external links section." As an additional point, references can also serve the purpose of establishing the notability of the subject of an article. I understand that this article could be improved significantly by further using the existing references as source material, and by changing some or all of the references to footnotes. But, the references for this article should still be listed in a References section, not an External links section. Mudwater (Talk) 00:27, 11 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Molo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply