Talk:John Aristotle Phillips
Latest comment: 2 years ago by ComradePenguinMonster in topic He is a scam artist and a domestic terrorist
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Incorrect Reference
editThe first reference, in the context of Freeman Dyson and someone else saying the plans were non-functional, actually leads to an article which says nothing of the sort. -- Jane Q. Public (talk) 19:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for being attentive! The linked version of the Vanity Fair article has several pages - one would have needed to click the little red "Next" button in the bottom right. I have now linked the single page view of the article to avoid this kind of problem. For the record, the cited part says:
- According to Dyson and the professor who ran the seminar, Harold Feiveson, Phillips’s design would not have worked. But functionality was not really the point; it was a political statement, and a grand one.
- Regards, HaeB (talk) 20:48, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
He is a scam artist and a domestic terrorist
editFirst he builds nuclear bombs in his dorm room. Now what is he doing? Stealing money from people on predictit.org. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n01Pn5Q9f_g — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.208.85 (talk) 22:49, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- 69.47.208.85, Do you have at least two credible secondary sources that prove (1) that Phillips is connected to predictit.org, and (2) that predictit.org is stealing money. --ComradePenguinMonster (talk) 08:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)