Talk:Jenna Fischer/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
She broke her back :-(
See [1] Should any of this be in the article? 69.143.11.232 20:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Wired cover
Does anyone have an image or know where to find one of the Wired cover? The trivia says she was naked... I know they can't have showed anything, but it's gotta be revealing! I want to see it! -Mike Payne 07:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Learn to Google search. But whatever, here it is. 70.185.171.184 17:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Error
She's listed as starring on "Undeclared" twice.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.158.14.91 (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Parade interview
In the section on her personal life, there's a paragraph about Fischer's separation from her husband. That paragraph has been the target of some back-and-forth about a quote from a Parade magazine interview, sort of a low-key edit war. I've attempted to resolve the issue with the following:
- When Fischer was asked, in an interview for the December 9, 2007 issue of Parade magazine, whether the couple might reconcile, Fischer replied "Everything is possible. That would be the best!"<ref name="parade"/> Over a month later, in a blog entry on Fischer's MySpace page<ref>[http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=27753303&blogID=349771654 Me and David Spade], a January 21, 2008 blog entry on Fischer's MySpace page</ref>, Fischer asserted that the Parade interview included a quote that was "completely out of context" without identifying the quote in question.
- Of course if a reliable source can be found that's more definitive (and gets past the Spam blacklist), feel free to add it, citing the source of course. 67.100.127.53 (talk) 20:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- I disagree. It's unnecessary. Commenting on the "feelings" of a factual situation is absurd. It reads like spin, as a distraction from the fact that Jenna's breakup with failed screenwriter James Gunn is an embarrassing situation for Gunn. If this is allowed, then certainly a paragraph about how James Gunn is still in love with wife should be allowed. Or why not a quote from Fischer about how she still loves her husband??? Of course these additions don't add anything of value to reporting of facts. They are weasel words meant to soften the blow from the factual assertion that she left her husband. It shouldn't be allowed because they don't affect the facts one way or the other. And if anything, wiki is a great opportunity to factually present "without emotion" about the history of life, celebrity and everything else without doing PR work these folks. If Jenna gets back together with Gunn, then report on it. Otherwise, just keep it simple. If that objection doesn't satisfy you, then the principle of creating lean, economic wiki pages without too much filler should be our goal here. This article can live without this addition just fine. It is embarassing to keep it in.209.181.73.91 (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- All that was done was to cite reliable sources (Parade and Fischer's MySpace page). If additional reliable sources are available, add them. Who knows or cares who left whom, unless reliable sources make such information available. 67.101.5.218 (talk) 02:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC).
- Actually, myspace and blogs and messageboards are NOT considered reliable sources. That, and simply citing a source to include frivolous material that puts a spin on the subject matter is relevant. It still violates NPOV because you are using the source to waterdown a factual situation. As it stands, it violates NPOV wiki policy and as such it will be removed. Have a nice day.209.181.73.91 (talk) 03:48, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- All that was done was to cite reliable sources (Parade and Fischer's MySpace page). If additional reliable sources are available, add them. Who knows or cares who left whom, unless reliable sources make such information available. 67.101.5.218 (talk) 02:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC).
Separation
This news came straight from their MySpace blog which has been verified to be owned by both James and Jenna. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justin0820 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Try one of these instead. Jauerback 01:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Jenna is separated from husband James Gunn, not divorced. So why does the section "LolliLove" refer to Gunn as her "ex-husband"? I corrected it to "husband". the couples current domestic status is mentioned under "Personal life". If and when they divorce, it should read "then-husband", as they were married during the making and release of the film.
Dating John Krazinski
In a paragraph under Personal Life, it mentions she is currently dating co-actor John Krazinski. This is pure speculation at this point, there is 100% no factual relevance for it (look it up, it's called Google), and whoever put it in didn't put any sort of reference. Should probably be deleted. --Brandon (talk) 21:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Wow, bad photo
The photo is not even identifiably her. Tempshill 06:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Bad photo, yes, I agree. Identifiable as her, I disagree. However, it looks like it's a free image, which is better than no image, I would think. Jauerback 19:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Changed it to the photo of her playing Pam Beesly on The Office. — Ian Lee (Talk) 19:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- I reverted your change. When we have a free image available, we never use a nonfree one. Granted, the one we currently have isn't ideal. But a nonfree one is certainly replaceable. See Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. -- RG2 20:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, but this is ridiculous. For months no one has been able to find an image, but the single one that have been found, isn't even clear enough to say it's her. This obviously failes "Acceptable quality" under bullet one of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. — Ian Lee (Talk) 06:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Using a fair-use image fails #12 of Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Unacceptable_images. I have reverted your edit. – JYi 06:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Again, it has been MONTHS. NO ONE has found a picture that even kinda-sorta looks like her. #12 refers to deciding between a free picture of acceptable quality (which is has not found for months) verses a nonfree picture. I'm going to revert the image as we're both over 3RR anyway. Please stop. — Ian Lee (Talk) 06:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Item 12 has nothing to do with quality. Quote: "taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image." In this case, yes it does serve the same encyclopedic purpose, regardless of whether or not one of "acceptable quality" is currently available. Is it possible to get one? Yes. This is a policy that has been enforced for years, it really isn't debatable. – JYi (talk) 06:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- But it doesn't serve the same encyclopedic purpose. A reader can not tell how she looks like with the photo you are supporting. Additionally, after months of searching, a photo has NOT been found. If after months of searching, a free photo is not found, it should be accepted that a nonfree photo must take its place. Stop being absurd. — Ian Lee (Talk) 06:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Pictures of people still alive are generally unacceptable if they are not free, as it's clearly possible to create a free image. If after months of searching, no photo is found, it just means that someone should go out and take one, since it's still possible. -- RG2 07:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- But it doesn't serve the same encyclopedic purpose. A reader can not tell how she looks like with the photo you are supporting. Additionally, after months of searching, a photo has NOT been found. If after months of searching, a free photo is not found, it should be accepted that a nonfree photo must take its place. Stop being absurd. — Ian Lee (Talk) 06:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, but this is ridiculous. For months no one has been able to find an image, but the single one that have been found, isn't even clear enough to say it's her. This obviously failes "Acceptable quality" under bullet one of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. — Ian Lee (Talk) 06:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- I reverted your change. When we have a free image available, we never use a nonfree one. Granted, the one we currently have isn't ideal. But a nonfree one is certainly replaceable. See Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. -- RG2 20:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Changed it to the photo of her playing Pam Beesly on The Office. — Ian Lee (Talk) 19:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Added new image. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
I didn't read all of the above but someone should edit her info to include the female in the Zoltan group in Dude Where's my car, I am pretty much sure her name is Zelmina (oh and she looks pretty funny in the movie too) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.221.170 (talk) 23:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- You're off-topic...it's not her anyway. You are referring to an actress who's on 24, don't know her name off-hand.69.123.157.188 (talk) 18:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Typing with 90% Accuracy
This is atrocious for a typist. Why is it mentioned? jej1997 (talk) 06:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Encyclopedia or fanpage?
"She rescued her own cat, Andy, while in college." How sweet. But how relevant? 94.101.5.97 (talk) 21:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
It's most likely there because it relates to the fact that she works with Kitten Rescue, and her work with them through auctions/fostering/etc....but I mean, it doesn't HAVE to be there. Or it could be worded a different way, like proceed the Kitten Rescue sentences ("Rescuing her own cat prompted her to join KR" or whatever).--Alwaysaparadox (talk) 23:12, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Jenna Fischer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100609093944/http://www.film.com:80/celebrities/jenna-fischer/story/interview-jenna-fischer-little-help/38746288 to http://www.film.com/celebrities/jenna-fischer/story/interview-jenna-fischer-little-help/38746288
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081218214703/http://www.variety.com:80/profiles/people/main/397148/Jenna%20Fischer.html?dataSet=1 to http://www.variety.com/profiles/people/main/397148/Jenna%20Fischer.html?dataSet=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Jenna Fischer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081220141400/http://www.harpmagazine.com:80/articles/detail.cfm?article_id=6552 to http://www.harpmagazine.com/articles/detail.cfm?article_id=6552
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110716161618/http://www.stylelist.com/2010/01/13/katy-perry-avril-lavigne-jenna-fischer-get-proactiv/ to http://www.stylelist.com/2010/01/13/katy-perry-avril-lavigne-jenna-fischer-get-proactiv/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Jenna Fischer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121021005630/http://www.allbusiness.com/services/amusement-recreation-services/4720482-1.html to http://www.allbusiness.com/services/amusement-recreation-services/4720482-1.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130102000814/http://cdn1.libsyn.com/prestonandsteve/PnS060408.mp3?nvb=20080620003833&nva=20080621003833&t=09837dbc7f4be7eda733b to http://cdn1.libsyn.com/prestonandsteve/PnS060408.mp3?nvb=20080620003833&nva=20080621003833&t=09837dbc7f4be7eda733b
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Real DOB?
She has claimed she graduated high school in 1991. Did she graduate a year early or is she lying about her age?
She skipped a grade when she was younger. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2C74:1A18:B40E:DD7F:8745:9A19 (talk) 23:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Says who? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.153.145.2 (talk) 22:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jenna Fischer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160602140734/http://gawker.com/296848/jenna-fischer-gently-breaks-the-divorce-news-to-myspace-friends to http://gawker.com/296848/jenna-fischer-gently-breaks-the-divorce-news-to-myspace-friends
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Lollilove awards
The section on Lollilove, says that "For her role in the film, Fischer was awarded a Screen Actors Guild (SAG) Emerging Actor Award." The citation for that sentence refers to an article that makes no mention of awards for the film. The awards section of the this wiki calls for citations for awards from St Louis Film Festival's SAG Emerging Actor Award. A quick search at both the SAG and St Louis Film Festival pages indicate this award is not given and I could find no info elsewhere for the award. Recommend removal of the comments for awards for the film.--Trilotat (talk) 15:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Jenna Fischer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717105150/http://www.trumanindex.com/2.10113/alumna-works-in-the-office-on-nbc-1.1465869 to http://www.trumanindex.com/2.10113/alumna-works-in-the-office-on-nbc-1.1465869
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100804221600/http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=27753303&blogID=141657788 to http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=27753303&blogID=141657788
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080224161744/http://www.nerinxalumnae.org/s/197/index2.aspx?sid=197&gid=1&pgid=299 to http://www.nerinxalumnae.org/s/197/index2.aspx?sid=197&gid=1&pgid=299
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090305002335/http://www.nbc.com/The_Office/bios/jenna_fischer.shtml to http://www.nbc.com/The_Office/bios/jenna_fischer.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jenna Fischer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090328103642/http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=27753303&blogId=429048027 to http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=27753303&blogID=429048027
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
agent & audition coach
- Naomi Yomtov
- Robert D'Avanzo
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC)