Talk:Jazz (miniseries)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

dead link removed edit

I removed the following dead link. One can still find the review linked here via the internet archive. I don't however consider it to be of high importance to the article.

-MrFizyx 19:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


I just put the original 2001 article on Ken Burns' JAZZ online at my web site for the Boston Jazz Scene. Here's the URL for the article: http://bostonjazzscene.blogspot.com/2011/08/review-of-ken-burns-jazz-series.html

Maybe you folks could set up the link again. Thanks for your consideration.

71.184.213.201 (talk) 18:39, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Stu Vandermark 08-02-11Reply

Trilogy?? edit

What exactly makes this a trilogy with Baseball and Civil War? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.11.134.202 (talk) 02:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Jazzburnsfhb.jpg edit

 

Image:Jazzburnsfhb.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unwarranted criticism of St. Clair's review removed edit

"Given this review, it seems likely that St. Clair did not watch the whole presentation, or didn't pay attention, as the viewpoint that St. Clair attributes to Burns, is exactly the opposite of the viewpoint of the text of the narration." This is blatant POV, and an unwarranted criticism of Jeffrey St. Clair's review, and I have removed it. I really don't think St. Clair would review a documentary he didn't watch from beginning to end. 66.189.183.82 (talk) 18:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jazz (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply